AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Steve Alemansour

MATH160 · MATH115 · G160 · G120 · MATHG160 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can handle heavy math work and inconsistent support, especially online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkSelf-taught onlineMixed teaching qualityTough examsHard workload
  • Online reviews describe little interaction, , and a .
  • and very disorganized lectures.
  • Students , and real effort for modest grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students mention , and withdrawals.

Online evidence is worse because students describe self-teaching, while but still work-heavy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is described as hard, textbook-dependent, and .

, while in-person reviews range from understandable examples to .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears in several tags, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendations are split, but the negative reviews are severe and focus on poor support, hard work, and disorganization.

Online students do not recommend him, while and strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades look unforgiving because , and no reported A grades.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both suggest grade pressure, with .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The workload is consistently described as lots of homework and time-consuming preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews call the workload excessive, and in-person reviews also warn students to prepare for a lot of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with but serious complaints about , no interaction, and disorganized lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated much weaker, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment appears , and final exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lecture review and one severe complaint about disorganization.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent lecture quality and .

What students said

“Mr. Alemansour explained the material in a way that was easy to understand.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATHG160

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report a and weak instructor interaction.

Main concern

The main concern is learning difficult math mostly from the textbook with limited help.

What students said

“Lets the students learn themselves through the textbook which is hard as well to understand.”
G160
“You are literally self-taught, .”
MATH115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , and finals, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Test HeavyQuizzesMidtermFinal Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

QuizzesMidtermFinal Exams
“A lot of and exams but it's fair.”
G120
“The class avg. grade on the 1st test was 71% and on the 2nd test a 68%.”
MATHG160

Online

Online reviews mention tests and discussions, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test HeavyOnline Discussions
“Work is hard and .”
G160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You are literally self-taught, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Be prepared to do a lot of hw but hey that is how you will lea”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“Never again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Alemansour explained the material in a way that was easy to understand.
  • .
  • You are literally self-taught, .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Work is hard and .
  • The class avg. grade on the 1st test was 71% and on the 2nd test a 68%.
  • Be prepared to do a lot of hw but hey that is how you will lea

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across multiple years give useful but mixed evidence, with limited grade detail and only two online reviews.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

G1201 review
G1601 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1601 review
MATHG1601 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2