AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Zugates

MATH170 · MATH010 · MATH115 · SURVEYTOCALU · MATH180 · MATH10 · MATHALG · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you are willing to attend, do the homework, and study, but if you need a slow-paced math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardThorough LecturerLots of HomeworkMixed ClarityFair If You WorkHard Tests
  • Many and ability to make math understandable.
  • The , and tests, so effort is required.
  • Reviews are mixed because some .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and consistent effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Some students say he makes math understandable, but others describe fast pacing, hard material, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show a and harder upper math.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, but strict attendance penalties are not clearly described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and do the work, but several reviews warn against taking him.

All recommendation evidence is in person and is clearly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students say effort can earn an A, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and multiple tests appear common, with some students calling the .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most positive reviews call him thorough and helpful, but negative .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and studying rather than relying on one format alone.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but often say he teaches thoroughly and rewards students who do the work.

Main concern

Some students report fast pacing, unclear explanations, lots of .

What students said

“If you do the work, you will get an A.”
MATH10
“ ”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and multiple tests, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesMultiple TestsExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or final format.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesMultiple Tests
“Weekly quizzes and 3 tests.”
MATH10
“ ...”
MATH170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the work, you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting mixed themes in teaching, effort, workload, and tests; credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

72/100

“ . He makes difficult concepts easily understandable.”

Effort to Get an A

70/100

“Easy A if you attend lectures and do the work!”

Workload

45/100

“Assigns lots of HW but so its up to you if you want to do them, if you don't then you will fail for sure.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • wonderful teacher! extremely through, knowledgeable, had little tricks for remembering steps and you can tell he wants to help you understand math.
  • though, test are like a 3 in the easiness scale.
  • This class is easy, but .

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • If you go to class and and study you should have no problem getting an A.
  • Just to pass his clas you have to study ur ass off, and he expected you to understand everything.
  • as hard as possible.

Theme 3

Workload and Tests

  • .
  • A fair amount of homework and weekly quizzes.
  • Very calm and lazy by nature but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews give broad evidence, but many are old and opinions vary sharply by course and student skill.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1706 reviews
MATH0104 reviews
MATH103 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATHALG1 review
SURVEYTOCALU1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values