AI Rate Professor

Economics

Deborah Frohman

ECON175 · G171 · G175 · ECON170 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle dry lectures and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear GradingBoring LecturesTest HeavyFlexible Curve
  • Students consistently say she cares and works with struggling students.
  • Grades are helped by a flexible scale or curve, but because .
  • The main drawback is very boring, lecture-heavy classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A grades are realistic because of curves and , but students still need to attend and follow class material.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The economics content is manageable and often explained twice, though lectures are dull and attendance-dependent.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required, but multiple reviews say skipping class hurts performance.

, and they consistently tie class presence to passing or understanding.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

77/100

Most students recommend her because , and willing to help despite boring lectures.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students cite a curve, flexible grading scale, and average.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually described as manageable, though some reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is caring, knowledgeable, and fair, but repeated complaints about boring lectures cap the teaching score.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Comments emphasize tests, in-class material, practice problems, and homework as support work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a caring professor with , and boring but manageable lectures.

Main concern

Lectures can be dull and .

What students said

“ .”
ECON170
“Show up to class or !”
G175
“Her lectures are boring and hard to pay attention too but she cares about her students and wants you to pass”
ECON170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show test-heavy assessment based on class material and practice problems, but they do not clearly prove book policy or .

Test HeavyIn-Class MaterialPractice ProblemsClear Grading Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

material and practice problems, with no clear evidence about open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyIn-Class MaterialPractice Problems
“Most of the problems.”
G175
“Her tests arent very hard and .”
G171

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very fair and will work with you if you are struggling.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is very fair and will work with you if you are struggling.”

📈

78/100

“The so 85% A, 75%B.”

⚠️ Lecture Experience

58/100

“She has unbelievably boring lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's approachable and willing to work with students.
  • .
  • She is well versed in Micro and Macro Econ and teaches it pretty straight forward.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The so 85% A, 75%B.
  • Her tests arent very hard and .
  • Not too hard to figure things out in the class, but you have to really want the grade to get it.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Show up to class or !
  • Her lectures are painful to sit through.
  • Very dull lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews across several years show consistent themes , and attendance importance.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON1704 reviews
ECON1752 reviews
G1711 review
G1751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values