AI Rate Professor

English

Kabaji Noha

ENG140 · ENGCOMP · ENG100 · ENG010 · ENG099 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague instructionsSelf-teaching requiredHarsh gradingUnorganized courseStrongly not recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the teaching as , and unhelpful.
  • Both online and in-person reviews say students must depend heavily on themselves.
  • Grades appear hard to earn, with and very low recommendation sentiment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students report , and even one A in a large class.

Online reviews stress rough grading and vague assignments, while students earned an A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels hard mainly because , and students must teach themselves.

Both online and emphasizing scattered assignment links.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags say skipping class can cause failure, but comments do not show that .

Both formats include evidence that participation or presence matters, but no review clearly states a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly say not to take her because the , and .

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, with online comments especially direct about avoiding the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and a student working extremely hard for only a B.

Format shift

Online reviews mention rough grading, while A grades.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe complicated papers, heavy independent work, and needing to do most learning themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize scattered and complicated assignments, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most students describe her as , and not actually teaching enough.

Format shift

Both online and review noting she cares despite weak clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and independent work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also very negative, with repeated , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“30-35 in the class and only one person got an A!”
ENG100
“ and very unhelpful.”
ENG100
“Doesnt' really teach, mostly dependent upon yourself.”
ENG010

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are extremely negative, emphasizing vague , and little help.

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“Be prepared to do everything yourself”
ENG140
“Lack of papers, no help when asked”
ENGCOMP

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you value your time and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This teacher is absolutely horrible.”

⚖️

10/100

“30-35 in the class and only one person got an A!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not the . Uses poor skills. Mediocre teaching
  • and very unhelpful.
  • Doesnt' really teach, mostly dependent upon yourself.

Theme 2

📄

  • Assignments are also stretched among multiple links for whatever reason, contradictory, and .
  • Lack of papers, no help when asked
  • you have to be dependent on yourself because .

Theme 3

📉 About Grades & Recommendation

  • i worked crazy hard and got a B.
  • If you value your time and .
  • don't do it!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across online and , though several are old and some lack detailed course mechanics.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1003 reviews
ENG0101 review
ENG0991 review
ENG1401 review
ENGCOMP1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values