AI Rate Professor

Biology

Tanya Murray

MRSCC100 · BG185 · BIOL100C · BIO183 · BIO220 · BIOLG183 · BOTANY183 · G220 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable self-teaching and , and exam quality.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized teachingExam errorsSelf-teaching neededStrict grading riskMixed older praise
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, citing lateness, disorganization, , and .
  • Online evidence is split between an easy class and a poorly organized proctored class.
  • Older positive reviews praise her helpfulness, but the overall recommendation rate is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades and , but , and self-teaching make an A unreliable.

Online evidence includes one easy class and one messy class, while and harsh grade complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Biology content can be manageable with study guides, but and self-teaching raise the real difficulty.

Online reviews make one course sound easy, while and independent study.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At least one in-person review says skipping class risks failure, but the evidence is not consistent across all reviews.

; online reviews do not clearly prove attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The very low recent recommendation tone , and harsh or inconsistent student experiences.

Online recommendation is split, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and some lenient homework comments help, but and refusal to round near an A create real risk.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is mixed, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload varies by course, with reading, papers, labs, and self-teaching offset by some easy labs and assignments.

Format shift

Online workload ranges from minimal effort to messy assignments, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Recent detailed comments describe lateness, disorganization, , and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed, while and strongest negative detail.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews , and assignments, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews mention labs, discussions, tests, quizzes, and assignments, while , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with recent comments warning about disorganization, lateness, and .

Main concern

because lectures and as inconsistent and error-prone.

What students said

“LOTS OF AND QUIZZES.”
BG185
“ .”
BIO220

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one says the class was a breeze, while the and messy grading criteria.

Main concern

Online organization and proctoring can be frustrating depending on the course.

What students said

“Unfortunately uses a .”
MRSCC100
“Took the online class and it was a breeze!”
BIOL100C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The overall exam risk is high because one online review cites proctoring software and alignment.

Proctoring SoftwareExam ErrorsQuizzesStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, but they repeatedly mention exam errors, study guides, and test alignment problems.

Exam ErrorsQuizzesStudy GuidesChecklist Mismatch
“LOTS OF AND QUIZZES.”
BG185
“ but she'll give .”
BIO220
“most of the stuff on the checklist werent on the test.”
G220

Online

Online evidence explicitly mentions annoying proctoring software in one course, while the other and quizzes were simple after reading.

Proctoring SoftwareTests And Quizzes
“Unfortunately uses a .”
MRSCC100
“Labs, discussions, and online readers!”
BIOL100C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . SHE IS VERY UNORGANIZED AND DOES NOT KNOW HER FACTS. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“She is a nice professor but lacks structure in teaching.”

⚠️

35/100

“LOTS OF AND QUIZZES.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • powerpoint/no words.
  • .
  • she makes it easy to understand everything and !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor Murray had no decency to round my overall grade from a 89.73% up to a 90% to recive the A.
  • She's very lenient and let you make up homeworks near the end.
  • You have to study and put effort in to do well but an A is very doable!

Theme 3

🧪

  • syllabus and as I think she never updated it from the last class.
  • and quizes, changed our syllabus countless times
  • Unfortunately uses a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years provide detailed evidence, though older positive reviews conflict with newer negative ones.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

BIO2204 reviews
BIO1833 reviews
1831 review
BG1851 review
BIOL100C1 review
Show 4 more courses
BIOLG1831 review
BOTANY1831 review
G2201 review
MRSCC1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values