AI Rate Professor

English

Christopher Weaver

ENGLG110 · ENGG110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Only consider this professor if you are comfortable with a and accept the risk of a highly polarizing classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing experienceChallenging writing classGood feedback for invested studentsUncomfortable classroom concernReading and participation required
  • Reviews are sharply split between one student who found the class valuable and one who withdrew after serious discomfort.
  • The course can reward invested students, but it is not easy and , and writing effort.
  • The negative conduct complaint is severe enough to lower the overall recommendation despite one strong positive review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but the positive review says the class is not easy and requires real investment.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course is intellectually demanding because it challenges writing and analytical skills and requires reading and participation.

Course challenge .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Attendance and participation .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Recommendation depends heavily on tolerance for a polarizing classroom, since one student loved the challenge and another withdrew after serious discomfort.

and directly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The but suggests an A is achievable with effort rather than easy or harsh by default.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The class requires reading, participation, writing improvement, and sustained investment, making the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

Workload evidence comes from the positive in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching may help motivated students improve, but the severe discomfort complaint creates a major classroom experience risk.

Format shift

positive and one highly negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The , and participation than exam-centered grading.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and feedback while another reports inappropriate and uncomfortable behavior.

Main concern

The main concern is the severe negative report about inappropriate jokes and discomfort in class.

What students said

“His class wasnt easy, but an A (along with lots of life advice!) is achievable!”
ENGLG110
“There were multiple incidents where he made us feel really uncomfortable.”
ENGG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterms, finals, or quiz structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There were multiple incidents where he made us feel really uncomfortable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the strong split between writing growth and classroom comfort concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Classroom Risk

40/100

“There were multiple incidents where he made us feel really uncomfortable.”

✍️ Writing Growth

45/100

“Prof. Weaver really values teaching his students & wants them to improve their writing & analytical skills.”

📈 Effort For Grade

45/100

“His class wasnt easy, but an A (along with lots of life advice!) is achievable!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Weaver really values teaching his students & wants them to improve their writing & analytical skills.
  • Probably the .

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty And Effort

  • He's challenged me as a writer & as a person as wellhe has lots of wisdom to impart if and invest yourself in class.
  • His class wasnt easy, but an A (along with lots of life advice!) is achievable!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Comfort

  • There were multiple incidents where he made us feel really uncomfortable.
  • So inappropriate and disturbing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews, they conflict sharply, and one is a severe outlier-level complaint.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGG1101 review
ENGLG1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1