AI Rate Professor

English

Jordan Khajavipour

ENGL099 · ENGL100 · ENG101 · ENG100 · G100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and can handle steady reading, participation, and essay work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorLots of ReadingHelpful FeedbackExtra CreditParticipation Matters
  • Most students praise Khajavipour as caring, supportive, and .
  • The class is not an effortless A because , and participation matter.
  • A few reviews warn about disorganization, missed classes, rambling, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Students can earn A grades with effort, participation, , and help, but the class is not for students seeking no-work credit.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The course is manageable but , and idea development make it a real workload.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and class engagement helps, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

and class presence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and writing growth, though several warn about workload and organization issues.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mostly positive with a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and sometimes easy writing grades, but students must still complete substantial work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and participation demands.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern appears only in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students mostly describe him as caring, helpful, and and organization.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and mostly positive with a few negative outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

and participation, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a , participation, and steady reading.

Main concern

The workload can feel heavy, and a minority of students report disorganization or delayed grades.

What students said

“if you are looking for an easy A .”
ENGL100
“it was all sustainable work as long as you kept up.”
G100
“He gives a lot of and wants all of his students to do well.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and the course appears driven by essays and reading assignments rather than traditional exams.

Essay-Based AssessmentReading ResponsesNo Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essays, reading questions, online responses, and homework, but do .

Essay-Based AssessmentReading ResponsesOnline Homework
“He assigns a and spaces out 5 essays throughout the semester”
ENGL100
“He gives a lot of online homework, usually includes .”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really does love his job and wants everyone to pass and will help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“I really felt like I gained so much insight from him and felt like he actually wanted us to learn.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“He assigns a and spaces out 5 essays throughout the semester”

⚖️ Grade Effort

70/100

“be sure to work for your grade, and you will be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about his students.
  • and in class.
  • He rambles too much and writes so much that I would get lost in his words.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of reading (fun though), participation matters, !
  • I did work totally-really-super hard, and asked for his help.
  • As long as you do the work and participate you'll pass.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He gave many opportunities and really wanted his students to pass
  • he has no hesitation with and understanding.
  • , because they inspired me to dig deeper and develop ideas

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The rating has medium credibility because 9 detailed in-person reviews are mostly consistent but include a few strong negative reports.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1005 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENGL0991 review
ENGL1001 review
G1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1