AI Rate Professor

English

Martha Bergman

ENGL099 · ENG110 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH99 · ENGLG099 · ENG100 · GWC60743 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can tolerate heavy , and frequent self-advocacy.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Paper LoadDisorganizedTough GraderAttendance MattersHelpful If Asked
  • Most students describe the class as , and unclear.
  • , and the workload is much higher than expected for introductory English.
  • A few students , and offers if students are patient and ask questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

can help, but the A requires heavy writing, attendance, patience with , and sustained effort.

Online evidence is negative and workload-heavy, while but remains demanding.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content is made harder by frequent essays, confusing instructions, scattered lectures, and .

Both online and in-person reviews describe the class as difficult, with the single online review especially focused on excessive workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Reviews repeatedly say attendance matters and that missed classes .

, though online evidence comes from only one review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because the workload, organization, grading, and .

The online review is strongly negative, and few supportive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students describe tough essay grading and in some sections.

Format shift

and workload, while in-person evidence adds tough grading and occasional .

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Students repeatedly mention paper after , and group work.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy workload, with the online review also saying the work takes most of the student's time.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

She is often described as kind and willing to help, but too many , and unclear.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes disorganization, while poor teaching organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear dominated by , and group assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe heavy , and tough grading, with some praise for kindness and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly , and assigns too much writing.

What students said

“Hardest if you dont attend class.”
ENG100
“She is definitely a , but offers a decent amount of .”
ENG110
“TONS of I have over 100% in the class.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The one online review , and a workload that consumes too much time.

Main concern

The workload is described as overwhelming and .

What students said

“ .”
ENGL100
“ .”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and mixed, with some notes allowed on tests and quizzes but exam format.

Notes Allowed On Tests And QuizzesFinal Exam MentionedReading Comprehension TestsIn-Class Essays

Assessment risk

Varies

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, quizzes, in-class essays, reading comprehension tests, and a allowed on almost everything.

Notes Allowed On Tests And QuizzesFinal Exam MentionedReading Comprehension TestsIn-Class Essays
“ .”
ENGLISH99
“ .”
ENGLISH99
“She allows ”
ENGL100

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove any exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hardest if you dont attend class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ and unprofessional yet expects utter perfection from all of us.”

📚 Workload Pressure

14/100

“ .”

⚖️

26/100

“She is definitely a , but offers a decent amount of .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • her class before the semester ended.
  • 5 essays throughout the semester, ranging from 4-6 pages.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but she isn't.
  • and unprofessional yet expects utter perfection from all of us.
  • if you are trying to learn.

Theme 3

🪑 And Grades

  • .
  • if you dont attend class.
  • Your overall grade in the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across online and workload, disorganization, and strict attendance.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1104 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENGL0992 reviews
ENGLISH992 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGLG0991 review
GWC607431 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1