AI Rate Professor

History

Maria Romero

G17560676 · HISTORY175 · HIST175 · HISG170 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Maria Romero only if you are and assignments, with better evidence for the online format than in person.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught FeelHeavy ReadingFair Online GradingMixed Lectures
  • In-person students are sharply split, with two reviews calling the class self-taught and one finding lectures engaging.
  • The online review is much more positive and .
  • Getting an A requires reading, weekly work, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it is not easy and , and .

The online review reports fair grading and , while easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not described as conceptually brutal, but the course can feel harder because and self-teaching.

Online evidence makes the material sound manageable with guides, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, but and assignments.

Only in-person reviews discuss lectures, while the online review focuses on required .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Recommendation depends strongly on format and learning style because but .

The single online review recommends her, while two of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

online study guides but no strong sign of an easy A in person.

Format shift

as fair, while as passable but effort-based.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention weekly homework, bigger assignments, lots of reading, discussion boards, and papers.

Format shift

Online workload centers on textbook reading and required discussions, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One student praises entertaining lectures, but help and feel self-taught.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated positively, while and often negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix weekly homework, , and tests.

Format shift

Online comments mention discussions and tests, while , and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

that the course feels self-taught despite one student enjoying the lectures.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves from the book and assignments.

What students said

“This was a self taught class, so you will need to buy the book and read it yourself and learn.”
HIST175
“essentially a teach yourself class If youre ”
HISTORY175
“Her lectures were entertaining to me, she showed a lot of videos and .”
G17560676

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online , and required discussion boards.

Main concern

The accelerated format includes a large textbook and required discussions.

What students said

“A great teacher who .”
HISG170
“Study guides are related to the tests and short answer questions are clearly stated in study guide.”
HISG170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Tests With Study GuidesMidterm And FinalShort Answer Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final and test-heavy work, but do not clearly prove the .

Midterm And FinalTest Heavy
“ and , but her class is definitely easily passable.”
G17560676
“It is not an Easy A class”
HIST175

Online

The online review says study guides match tests and short answer questions are clearly stated, but .

Tests With Study GuidesShort Answer Questions
“Study guides are related to the tests and short answer questions are clearly stated in study guide.”
HISG170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“essentially a teach yourself class If youre ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format differences, teaching quality, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Her lectures were entertaining to me, she showed a lot of videos and .”

📈 Effort For Grades

54/100

“Its not an easy A you do have to do your work.”

⚖️ Format Split

46/100

“A great teacher who .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This was a self taught class, so you will need to buy the book and read it yourself and learn.
  • she provides no helpful information during lectures to aid in taking notes
  • Her lectures were entertaining to me, she showed a lot of videos and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • Its not an easy A you do have to do your work.
  • , but not hard.
  • 2 discussion boards that are required.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews give limited but useful evidence, with a and mixed consistency across students.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

G175606761 review
HISG1701 review
HIST1751 review
HISTORY1751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values