AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Craig Grant

PSY280 · PSY200 · PSYC280 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
95.65%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Craig Grant if you want a challenging but and participation are strongly rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorInspirationalGroup ProjectsHard But FairExtra Credit
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Craig Grant as caring, passionate, and willing to help before and after class.
  • The course is demanding, especially with APA format, group work, and participation, but students describe the grading as fair and supported.
  • Students who attend, participate, and complete the work often say they can earn a strong grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say an A is very reachable if you show up, participate, use his help, and complete the work, but it is not a handout.

The , while the single online review gives praise but no grade details.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject and and group projects, but his support makes the class manageable.

but supported course, while online evidence is too vague to assess content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because students repeatedly warn that skipping class leads to being lost or not passing.

In-person reviews strongly tie success to showing up, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and rewards honest effort.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation score is driven .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

He is sometimes called a , but students say , and the grade students earn.

Format shift

, while the single online review gives no grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload includes participation, , and effort, but students rarely describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person workload is clearly active and project-based, while online workload is not described.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and able to make difficult material engaging.

Format shift

In-person evidence is detailed and overwhelmingly positive, while the online review is positive but brief.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment combines , and class participation.

Format shift

, and homework, while online assessment details are not provided.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing care, accessibility, clear help, , and hard-but-fair expectations.

Main concern

Students who skip class, avoid group work, or .

What students said

“If you come, Participate, and do your work you will pass.”
PSY200
“Yes, you have to put in work and effort. Don't be lazy.”
PSYC280
“A professor that cares about you as an individual and your future.”
PSY200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is very positive but gives almost no detail beyond strong praise.

Main concern

The evidence is too thin to judge online workload or assessment details confidently.

What students said

“ .”
PSY200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly in parts because and , but policies are not fully described.

At-Home QuizzesExam Q&APractice Problems On Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and practice problems appearing on tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

At-Home QuizzesExam Q&APractice Problems On Tests
“ and .”
PSY200
“ ”
PSY200
“some of the quiz questions and practice problems he assigns in group are right on the test.”
PSY200

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or quiz policies.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Grant is, without a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting teaching support, effort-reward grading, participation, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“I have never had a professor that cares as much as he does.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Take his class!”

📈 Effort And Grades

82/100

“You earn an A just simply showing up and doing your work”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support And Character

  • Professor Grant is the .
  • He will come early and stay late for his students to understand the material.
  • A professor that cares about you as an individual and your future.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty And Effort

  • Yes, you have to put in work and effort. Don't be lazy.
  • If you're looking for a hand
  • Prof. Grant is hard but fair.

Theme 3

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 About Participation And Projects

  • If you come, Participate, and do your work you will pass.
  • The but some group members did not show up to help us but wanted a good grade.
  • there is plenty of group projects and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across several years are detailed and highly consistent, with .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY20020 reviews
PSYC2802 reviews
PSY2801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

7

B 7

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values