AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Frederick Judd

G215 · G110 · ACCTG215 · ACCT110 · ACCTG110 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to actually learn accounting and , and participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring teacherKnowledgeableHeavy homeworkFair graderFun lectures
  • Most students strongly praise Judd as caring, knowledgeable, funny, and committed to learning.
  • The class often , and project effort.
  • Online reviews are mixed because one is extremely negative, while the other online reviews are positive and detailed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are very possible because he rewards effort and , but students , and participation.

Online reviews range from doable A with effort to one harsh workload complaint, while as fair and worthwhile.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Accounting content is often challenging, but and review support make it manageable.

Both formats describe real work, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but students repeatedly say class, participation, and review sessions are important for success.

, while online reviews emphasize participation and completing assigned work.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because he teaches clearly, cares about learning, and makes difficult accounting material engaging.

, while online reviews are mostly positive but include one severe negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students call him extremely fair and say he awards effort, though tests and .

Format shift

, while online reviews suggest effort can lead to an A.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Many students mention lots of , and participation requirements.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial work, with the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most reviews describe him as , and highly invested in student learning.

Format shift

, while online feedback is positive overall but includes one severe negative review.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and exams rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and tests, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly praise his teaching, humor, fairness, and support, while and attendance.

Main concern

Students should expect lots of work and .

What students said

“ ! Be prepared to do A LOT of hmwk!”
ACCT110
“Lots of hw and class participation is required, but .”
G110
“Subject is challenging, but he awards effort.”
ACCTG110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and learning value, but one review calls the workload horrible.

Main concern

Online workload and .

What students said

“Good amount of work but definitely doable.”
G215
“He assigns a good amount of work (75% of which is discussion), but .”
G215
“Very lazy & wants you to do so much work, for only 10 points.”
ACCT110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can be manageable with study and review, but some questions are tricky and reviews .

Chapter TestsReview SessionsTricky QuestionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tests as reviewed and sometimes tricky, with .

Review SessionsTricky QuestionsTests Not Too Hard With Study
“The and he reviews a lot of materials beforehand so It helps a lot.”
ACCTG110
“Study hard for the tests because about half of the questions are designed to trick you.”
G110
“ .”
ACCTG110

Online

Online reviews mention tests and chapter tests, but do not clearly .

Chapter TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and you should pass with A.”
ACCTG215
“ if you skim the chapter and follow his format for the project.”
G215

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher! Lots of hw and class participation is required, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He makes class fun, interesting, and educational.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“Be prepared to do A LOT of hmwk!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made learning Payroll extremely fun.
  • His teaching style & class structure are clearly designed to promote comprehension.
  • He makes class fun, interesting, and educational.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Subject is challenging, but he awards effort.
  • ! Be prepared to do A LOT of hmwk!
  • You have to put in the effort to achieve a good grade.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Projects

  • The and he reviews a lot of materials beforehand so It helps a lot.
  • Study hard for the tests because about half of the questions are designed to trick you.
  • Start the project ASAP.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across online and , though one online outlier lowers certainty slightly.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG1106 reviews
ACCT1103 reviews
G1103 reviews
G2152 reviews
ACCTG2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1