AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Elizabeth D. Sykes

CBA165 · CBA5843 · G152 · CBA152 · CBA145 · NETWORKING · CBAG101 · GBAG170 · IT131 · CBA101 · CBAG135 · CBAG195 · CBASECT · IT117 · ACCESSECT · CBAG190 · IT116 · G195 · IT1152 · CBA181 · CBAG120 · CBA100 · CBAG156 · CBA150 · IT135 · CBA155 · WORD155 · WORD2013 · ACCES165 · WINDOWSXPDOS · CBAALL · CBA156 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you can work independently , and delayed feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy workloadPoor communicationTough gradingAvoid
  • Most students describe serious problems with , and clarity.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as excessive for the unit value of the courses.
  • A few older positive reviews exist, but they are overwhelmed by consistent negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and .

Both online and students especially citing missing feedback.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The subject matter may be basic, but and poor organization make the courses feel much harder.

Online reviews emphasize confusing course management, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

At least , and several others suggest participation and labs are central.

, while online reviews focus more on due dates and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because of disorganization, poor communication, heavy work, and .

Both formats are negative, with online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Many students report tough, delayed, or work.

Format shift

Online and , with online reviews adding end-of-semester grading delays.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Students repeatedly , and workload far beyond the course unit value.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews emphasizing hours of typing and job.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most reviews describe unclear teaching, poor organization, weak support, and slow or missing responses.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on lack of communication, while and confusing classroom management.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy with , and some tests.

Format shift

Both formats mention many assignments, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

complaints about unclear teaching, overwhelming workload, and harsh or delayed grading.

Main concern

Students say the class is disorganized and requires far more time than expected.

What students said

“ and unclear.”
G152
“Taking just one class from her is like working more than a part time job.”
152
“Very harsh and .”
CBA155

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and excessive work.

Main concern

Students report little support and .

What students said

“ or test questions.”
CBA145
“Doesn't grade any work until end of semester so you don't know what's expected”
CBA145
“She hardly answers emails, her instructions are difficult to understand, and she is NO help at all when you ask for it!”
CBAG195

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but risky, with , and long final requirements mentioned more than student-friendly policies.

Open-book tests reported onceHands-on finalCumulative finalLong final examsFinal project

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but also challenging tests, cumulative finals, hands-on finals, long exams, and .

Open-book testsChallenging testsCumulative finalHands-on finalFinal project
“ , but very challenging.”
CBA100
“ and does not allow review.”
CBA156
“15 pg Final Project, 4 separate LONG final exams”
CBAG156

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and a but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesHands-on final
“The .”
CBA145
“After taking the quizzes and looking over .”
CBA145

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Very bad communicator in regards to what's expected regarding assignments and when you and when she does it's past the due date.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ and unclear.”

⚖️

12/100

“Very harsh and .”

📚 Workload

8/100

“Taking just one class from her is like working more than a part time job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her class was chaos.
  • and unprepared.
  • She doesn't teach anything just talks.

Theme 2

📨 About Communication

  • , and if she does, she is no help.
  • .
  • manner (if at all).

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • The amount of work she gives you is insane.
  • and HW for a 2 unit class.
  • Expect to try your hardest and fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-nine reviews over many years show detailed and highly consistent complaints, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 528

Course coverage

CBA1556 reviews
G1525 reviews
CBA1002 reviews
CBA1012 reviews
CBA1452 reviews
Show 28 more courses
CBA1812 reviews
CBAG1012 reviews
IT1162 reviews
IT1312 reviews
1521 review
ACCES1651 review
ACCESSECT1 review
CBA1501 review
CBA1521 review
CBA1561 review
CBA1651 review
CBA58431 review
CBAALL1 review
CBAG1201 review
CBAG1351 review
CBAG1561 review
CBAG1901 review
CBAG1951 review
CBASECT1 review
G1951 review
GBAG1701 review
IT11521 review
IT1171 review
IT1351 review
NETWORKING1 review
WINDOWSXPDOS1 review
WORD 20131 review
WORD1551 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1