AI Rate Professor

Design

Greg Wight

DSGNG154 · DESNDESN · DSGN100 · DESN105 · DGSN105 · DESIGN101 · DSGN132 · DRAFTING100 · DESN131 · DESIGN105 · DSGN105 · DSGN154 · DESIGN131 · DESIGN150 · DESIGN130 · DSGN131 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you , and can handle a flexible class that rewards self-direction.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate MentorHands-On ProjectsPortfolio FocusedHelpful Outside ClassLoose Structure
  • Most students describe Wight as deeply passionate, helpful, and willing to .
  • The classes are hands-on and portfolio-oriented, with strong rewards for motivated design students.
  • A minority of , and dependence on student initiative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

A grades are common and students call him lenient, but , and dedication.

All grade and effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is approachable and hands-on, but and self-directed effort.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Reviews , but studio access, participation, and asking for help appear important.

and entirely from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

because , and creates meaningful design projects.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because several students earned A grades and one review directly calls him very lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is moderate because projects can be demanding if students procrastinate, but there are and no textbook in some classes.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely in-person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Most reviews praise his passion, patience, knowledge, and extra help, despite some complaints about disorganization and lack of guidance.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The course appears project-heavy, with reviews emphasizing designs, studio work, portfolio pieces, postings, and few tests.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly , and practical design learning, though some students complain about disorganization and little direct teaching.

Main concern

Students who need tight structure or .

What students said

“You will work hard in his classes, but only so you may benefit from learning lifelong design skills, and have stunning portfolio pieces.”
DSGN132
“No textbook just art supplies and a dedication is required.”
DSGN100
“Very little structure to the class and the teacher does not offer much guidance.”
DESN131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest few tests and a project-based format, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, final format, or proctoring policies.

Tests Not ManyProject-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention few tests and project work, but do not clearly .

Tests Not ManyProject-Based Assessment
“Postings happen every 4 weeks.”
DSGN154
“No textbook just art supplies and a dedication is required.”
DSGN100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Greg is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Greg is one of the .”

🛠️ Hands-On Learning

86/100

“You will work hard in his classes, but only so you may benefit from learning lifelong design skills, and have stunning portfolio pieces.”

⚖️ Grading And Workload

80/100

“ and very lenient.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is always there for you.
  • Awesome instructor. !
  • Greg Wight is one of the most inspiring instructor and a very noble person.

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects And Skills

  • I never thought that I would learn so many skills.
  • You will work hard in his classes, but only so you may benefit from learning lifelong design skills, and have stunning portfolio pieces.
  • I love the laser, 3D printers and CNC router!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

  • Very little structure to the class and the teacher does not offer much guidance.
  • Some may be overwhelmed initially by Wight's methods.
  • Don't ever take a class with Greg Wight. He doesn't ever really teach anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 in-person reviews span many years and include consistent, detailed themes despite some older comments.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

DESIGN1313 reviews
DESIGN1012 reviews
DESIGN1052 reviews
DESNDESN2 reviews
DSGN1322 reviews
Show 11 more courses
DSGN1542 reviews
DESIGN1301 review
DESIGN1501 review
DESN1051 review
DESN1311 review
DGSN1051 review
DRAFTING1001 review
DSGN1001 review
DSGN1051 review
DSGN1311 review
DSGNG1541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values