AI Rate Professor

English

Jack Patterson

ENGLISHG99 · ENGLG09860721 · ENGG100 · ENGLISH100 · ENGG099 · ENGLISHG100 · ENG098 · G100 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless , and grading focused heavily on format.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear promptsFrequent tangentsHard gradingCaring but inconsistentEssay-focused
  • Many students say prompts and .
  • Several reviews describe off-topic lectures that hurt learning.
  • A few students praise his accessibility and say following instructions can work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students pass by following format rules and using , but and unclear prompts keep the A effort high.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The writing workload is not always large, but and expectations make the course feel harder than the content itself.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review says students should come every time, but the comments do not prove a .

, and attendance evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking him because lectures wander and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly describe hard grading, format-based deductions, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Several reviews mention only a few essays or quizzes, but the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Positive comments about being caring are outweighed by repeated complaints about tangents, confusion, and limited learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The class appears , and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, but the , and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say .

What students said

“ irrelevant topics while in class”
ENGG100
“ . and direct.”
ENGLISHG100
“ .”
ENG098

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essays, quizzes, and a mastery test, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

EssaysMastery TestQuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Rules

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a mastery test, but exam rules are not clearly described.

EssaysMastery TestQuizzes
“4 essays 40points,focus on the thesis statement and the form.”
ENGLG09860721
“He only has 4 essays. , and one for the mastery test. 2 Quizzes.”
ENGLG09860721

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ irrelevant topics while in class, often talks about next essay rather than clarifying the current essay.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I didn't get the chance to learn a thing considering his tangents were constant.”

⚖️

28/100

“This teacher grades you on format and NOT your ability to write.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't answer it he just hits a huge tangent
  • lectures aren't have nothing to do with the topic
  • and direct

Theme 2

📝

  • .
  • Follow instructions and you won't have a problem.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Jack is a very caring professor and funny.
  • The professor is a good guy and i am happy i had him as my first experience at GWC.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews across multiple years , and grading concerns.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGLG098607213 reviews
ENGLISH1003 reviews
ENGG1002 reviews
ENG0981 review
ENGG0991 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGLISHG1001 review
ENGLISHG991 review
G1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 3 · Drop/Withdrawal 3