AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jason Moss

MATH160 · MATH2 · CALC2 · MATHG160 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to teach yourself with little useful support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredDisorganizedUnhelpful answersLow recommendationPoor instruction
  • Students consistently say he does not teach effectively.
  • Passing appears possible mainly because some material is manageable on your own.
  • Every analyzed review recommends avoiding him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A pass may be possible in easier material, but getting an A would likely require heavy self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Some students call the material easy, but his weak teaching makes the course feel much harder.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

The not pass.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students uniformly warn against taking him because they feel he does not teach.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

, but the poor support makes grades feel hard-earned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload burden is mainly self-teaching because students say he relies on books and websites.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and barely teaching.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

instruction and leaves students to learn independently.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ unless you're willing to teach yourself Stats .”
MATHG160
“not once did he teach the class.”
MATH160
“He doesn't teach much, expects you to learn it yourself.”
CALC2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring rules, or book policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you're willing to teach yourself Stats .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“not once did he teach the class.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“If you're actually trying to learn a .”

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

25/100

“He doesn't teach much, expects you to learn it yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not once did he teach the class.
  • simply copied straight from the book and didn't say a word the whole class.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This teacher turns an otherwise easy subject into a difficult hassle.
  • It's possible to pass this class, but only because the material is easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Don't bother taking this class if you have him as a teacher.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across nearby terms are extremely consistent, though .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CALC22 reviews
MATH1601 review
MATH21 review
MATHG1601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1