AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Ullrich Richar

ESL071 · ESL53 · ESL063 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you can handle a demanding ESL class with and mixed student experiences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkMixed teaching qualityHelpful to some studentsHigh difficulty
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, ranging from awful to excellent.
  • Difficulty is consistently high in the newer reviews, with and lots of .
  • Some students still find him helpful and effective, especially for ESL support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is possible, but the comments and , and heavy effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course appears intellectually and practically demanding, especially in the newer reviews with difficulty ratings of five.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

in-person reviews, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students call him helpful or excellent while one strongly negative review warns against him.

Recommendation and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

, and the difficulty ratings are high.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The clearest workload evidence is a direct lots of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching feedback is inconsistent, with one awful review balanced by comments calling him helpful, excellent, and very good.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention lots of homework but .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

teaching and helpfulness while others describe him as awful and very difficult.

Main concern

The main concern is high difficulty, tough grading, and .

What students said

“hes the most awful professor Ive seen in my life.”
ESL53
“excellent lectures”
ESL063
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”
ESL063

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

No Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

No Clear Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Come on whats wrong with you guys? To be honest, hes the most awful professor Ive seen in my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed sentiment. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

22/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

30/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“excellent lectures”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • excellent lectures
  • he is a helpful teacher for esl students :D
  • He's a very good teacher! :)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Come on whats wrong with you guys? To be honest, hes the most awful professor Ive seen in my life.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and several are very short or vague.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

611 review
ESL0631 review
ESL0711 review
ESL531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1