AI Rate Professor

Art

Charles Peterson

ART106 · ARTG100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take Charles Peterson only if you can self-study well and and strict attendance rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingKnowledgeableConfusing lecturesHeavy examsStrict attendance
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him kind and knowledgeable and students .
  • In-person negative reviews describe heavy, , and exam-heavy grading.
  • The single online review is positive but too .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades, but detailed in-person comments , and self-study can make the A costly.

Online evidence includes an A+ and but lacks detail, while and serious workload and attendance risks.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The in-person course can feel difficult because , and exam content is crammed.

The online review is too vague to judge course difficulty, while delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

One detailed in-person review says missing more than one class or being tardy lowers the grade.

; the online review does not mention attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and student independence because positive kindness comments conflict with .

The online review is positive, while and include two strong negative warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Strict attendance penalties and students earning A grades.

Format shift

Online grading may be easier due to , while in-person grading includes strict attendance penalties and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

In-person workload feels heavy because one course includes an , and 14 online quizzes.

Format shift

Online workload is not clearly described, while and quiz demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Teaching is polarizing, with brief praise for knowledge and kindness offset by detailed .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but vague, while and includes strong negative detail.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The clearest assessment , and one essay.

Format shift

Online assessment details are unclear, while least one course.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but include strong , and crammed exams.

Main concern

Detailed negative , and strict attendance penalties.

What students said

“His lectures were heavy and confusing.”
ART106
“If you miss more than 1 class you automatically get one lower grade; also applies w/ tardies.”
54112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only online review is positive but very short, saying he is awesome, kindhearted, and knowledgeable.

Main concern

The online evidence is too .

What students said

“Awesome, kindhearted, good knowdgel”
ARTG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because an quizzes, and crammed chapter coverage.

Two ExamsFinal ExamFourteen Online QuizzesCrammed Exam ContentStrict Attendance Penalty

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence shows two exams, a final, 14 online quizzes, and crammed chapter coverage, but .

Two ExamsFinal ExamFourteen Online QuizzesCrammed Chapter Coverage
“There's 1 essay, 2 exams and 1 final and online 14 quizzes.”
54112
“Each exam is crammed 7 chapters worth of vocab.”
54112

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures were heavy and confusing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ .”

📚 Difficulty Pressure

32/100

“Each exam is crammed 7 chapters worth of vocab.”

⚖️

10/100

“If you miss more than 1 class you automatically get one lower grade; also applies w/ tardies.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were heavy and confusing.
  • and kind
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There's 1 essay, 2 exams and 1 final and online 14 quizzes.
  • Each exam is crammed 7 chapters worth of vocab.
  • If you miss more than 1 class you automatically get one lower grade; also applies w/ tardies.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • .
  • Avoid if possible.
  • Awesome, kindhearted, good knowdgel

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, and opinions are polarized, but the .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARTG1002 reviews
541121 review
ART1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values