AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Garima Garg

CHEM225LAB · CHEM185 · CHEM61542 · CHEM220 · CHEM180 · CHEM130 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Garima Garg only if you can teach yourself chemistry and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard testsConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkHelpful in labSelf-teaching needed
  • Students report difficult tests, frequent quizzes, and .
  • Teaching reviews are split, but the negative comments and poor organization.
  • Lab and individual-help comments are warmer than lecture comments, but the overall recommendation level is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears possible only with and because tests are repeatedly described as hard.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The chemistry content feels challenging because , and students report needing to teach themselves.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty, and they lean strongly difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is not clearly described as mandatory, but and as important for survival.

All attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most recommendation signals are weak because students often , and poor organization despite some kindness.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation tone is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because students mention , and needing strong preparation for an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is , and repeated homework complaints.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with confusion, organization, and weak question support.

Format shift

, while lab comments are somewhat more positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a final, with tests carrying high pressure.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe hard chemistry courses with mixed help quality and .

Main concern

because lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
CHEM220
“So just be ready to teach yourself if you're taking her.”
CHEM130
“Garima was the .”
CHEM225LAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a high-percentage final, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesHigh-Weight Final

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesHigh-Weight Final
“ . !”
CHEM220
“ and you should be able to answer them very quickly”
CHEM185
“ so high”
CHEM185

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So just be ready to teach yourself if you're taking her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

42/100

“She CANNOT teach.”

Grade Effort

35/100

“ are challenging but not hard... if you know the material an A shouldn't be a problem.”

35/100

“ . !”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Uses POGIl method instead actually teaching.
  • She also gets very defensive when you ask her questions
  • Her English is .

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • about half of the class have bad grades due to her ways of teaching.
  • and you should be able to answer them very quickly
  • and given in small, easy chunks every day.

Theme 3

Helpfulness

  • Very helpful and kind instructor
  • Willing to help students when needed.
  • Will refer you to tutoring instead of helping you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews across multiple chemistry courses give and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1803 reviews
CHEM1301 review
CHEM1851 review
CHEM2201 review
CHEM225LAB1 review
Show 1 more courses
CHEM615421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values