AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Thomas Hersh

ENVIR100 · ET100ACDC · ENS100 · ENVS170 · ENGRTECH120 · ENV100 · ENGRTECH150 · ELECT100 · ENVS100 · EVON100 · ENGACDC · ES162 · ENVSG100 · ENVSCI · ESA · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take Thomas Hersh only if you are comfortable teaching yourself and can tolerate inconsistent organization and support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent teaching qualityPoor online responsivenessWeekly test pressureOff-topic lecturesHelpful for motivated engineering students
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him helpful and .
  • Online and online-like courses , and poor email response.
  • , but environmental science reviews often criticize boring lectures and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

53/100

Some in-person sections sound easy, but online and environmental science reviews .

, while in-person evidence is split between easy engineering sections and frustrating environmental science sections.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The subject matter is not always described as intellectually hard, but poor structure, dry lectures, and .

, while in-person reviews vary from easy class to self-taught frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance rule, but .

Online attendance is not applicable, while than clearly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Many students warn against him because of poor , and disorganization despite a few positive reviews.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while engineering or hands-on contexts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Weekly tests are often described as report errors.

Format shift

Online reviews and test errors, while in-person reviews are more mixed.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework is often light or absent, but , and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention no homework but , while , and occasional papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

44/100

His knowledge is praised by some students, but many describe slow, off-topic, boring, unresponsive, or .

Format shift

Online teaching support is rated poorly, while in-person teaching ranges from helpful engineering instruction to ineffective environmental science lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment appears heavily test-driven, especially through weekly online quizzes or tests, with some labs and papers in certain sections.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on tests, while , and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with some praising his knowledge and field opportunities while many criticize off-topic, boring, or .

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent lecture value and .

What students said

“doesnt teach well in class and just talks about random stuff nobody wants to hear.”
ENVS100
“He is very smart in a variety of subjects and very helpful.”
ENGACDC
“If you are looking for an easy A then this is the class to take but if you actually want to learn because this is your major then forget it.”
ENV100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe confusing weekly tests, no homework practice, wrong or , and .

Main concern

The .

What students said

“There is .”
ENVSG100
“ them.”
ENVS100
“it's a lot harder to do well on tests when you aren't practicing the material with homework.”
ENVSCI

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

online tests and one older in-person review describing open notes and books.

Weekly Online TestsConfusing Test QuestionsPossible Open Notes In One SectionReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

classes and one open-notes, open-books test format, but policies vary by course.

Weekly Online TestsOpen Notes In One SectionFinal Paper In One Section
“he gives a test every week and and .”
ENVS100
“I think we had just 2 tests; open notes, books, anything but using other people.”
ENGRTECH120

Online

Online reviews support weekly tests with confusing or flawed questions, but they do not clearly .

Weekly TestsConfusing Test QuestionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and chapters in each.”
ENVSG100
“ them.”
ENVS100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take online, don't do in class. and a . Not too bad.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in online support, teaching consistency, and test design. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“doesnt teach well in class and just talks about random stuff nobody wants to hear.”

🧪 Test Experience

45/100

“ them.”

👍 Recommendation Level

32/100

“DO and .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • There is .
  • .
  • them.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks really slowly and about other environmental science subjects
  • He is very smart in a variety of subjects and very helpful.
  • Tends to digress from topic; like talking about missiles.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are looking for an easy A then this is the class to take
  • he gives a test every week and and .
  • class I think.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews across many years and formats provide enough detail, though the age and course variety reduce precision.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENVS1007 reviews
ENVSG1003 reviews
ENVIR1002 reviews
ES1622 reviews
ELECT1001 review
Show 10 more courses
ENGACDC1 review
ENGRTECH1201 review
ENGRTECH1501 review
ENS1001 review
ENV1001 review
ENVS1701 review
ENVSCI1 review
ESA1 review
ET100ACDC1 review
EVON1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not_Sure_Yet 3