AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammadreza Sabzevary

MATH030 · MATH30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesStrong accentStrict attendanceSelf-teaching requiredPoor outcomes
  • Students consistently warn against taking him, especially if they struggle with math.
  • Lectures are because , and course alignment are repeatedly criticized.
  • Grades look poor in the sample, with most reported outcomes being withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very unlikely because students report heavy effort, confusion, strict rules, and mostly withdrawals.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content may be developmental math, but students say and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

because one review says only one absence is allowed and .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students because and outcomes are poor.

All , and it is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reported grades and withdrawals suggest grading or course completion is unforgiving despite one mention of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe putting in a lot of effort and relying on ALEKS while .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly say his teaching , and poor at explaining basic concepts.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mainly mention homework, ALEKS, and , while .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, citing confusing , and withdrawals.

Main concern

Students say the class requires self-teaching and is especially bad for anyone already struggling with math.

What students said

“His method of teaching is all over the place.”
MATH030
“ if you already struggle with math.”
MATH30
“He also only allows 1 absence and .”
MATH030

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you already struggle with math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“His method of teaching is all over the place.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“ !”

📉 Grade Risk

8/100

“Overall, I put a lot of effort into this class and I was disappointed with the outcome.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His method of teaching is all over the place.
  • He also really struggles with explaining basic concepts and instructions.
  • During lecture, he only goes over the problems that are in the book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I took a withdraw with a D even though Prof told me if I stayed I would most likely pass.
  • Overall, I put a lot of effort into this class and I was disappointed with the outcome.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !!!
  • If given the option, I DO NOT recommend taking any class from this professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed but older reviews are consistent in tone, though the sample is small and limited to one course level.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH0303 reviews
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3