AI Rate Professor

Art

Darrell Ebert

ART106 · ART103 · ARTG107 · SCULPG141 · ART107 · DA177 · ARTG103 · SCULT142 · ART130 · PAINTG126 · ART142 · ARTG141 · ART109 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are a serious art student who , and tough grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh CritiquesTough GradingUnstructured ClassSelf-Sufficient RequiredArt Majors Only
  • Many and low grades despite heavy effort.
  • Positive reviews come mostly from serious art students who value his critical eye.
  • Beginners and non-majors often report little guidance and a discouraging classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students repeatedly report C grades after major effort and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The art content is not always conceptually advanced, but , and limited guidance make the courses hard to navigate.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance expectations are inconsistent, with one student and another saying students did not need to come.

, and they conflict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and disrespectful critiques, despite a few strong positive reviews from art-focused students.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly say grades are harsh, subjective, and often low even after serious effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Projects can require many hours and expensive supplies, even when some classes have only a few major projects.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

His talent and critique skills help some serious art students, but many reviews describe poor guidance, absence, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Assessment , and critiques rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with , and limited support.

Main concern

Students often say effort does not reliably translate into strong grades.

What students said

“He's extremely difficult, he doesn't grade on improvement what so ever and expects top notch work even if you don't have any art experience...”
ART107
“His class has NO structure, you wont learn anything from him(because he's never in class).”
ART109
“only people who are serious about their career will succeed in his class”
PAINTG126

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and critiques, but they do not clearly prove an .

Project-Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“all . FOUR.”
ART130
“He looks thru the portfolios and slaps grade on them.”
ART107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I worked extremely hard and got a C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He never taught us HOW to sculpt, he just expected us to magically know how to.”

⚖️

8/100

“I tried so damn hard in his class, spending hours and and I still ended up with a C.”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His class has NO structure, you wont learn anything from him(because he's never in class).
  • You need to be very self-sufficient to succeed in his classes.
  • I love his critiques which are very useful if your major is ART.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's extremely difficult, he doesn't grade on improvement what so ever and expects top notch work even if you don't have any art experience...
  • Everyone in class got a "C"? Even the talented guy?
  • Grades a little too harshly.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • .. he is so rude and disrespectful to everyone.
  • great teacher. really understands every aspect of every little thing.
  • This teacher ruined that passion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 reviews across several years show consistent patterns, though the reviews are old.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 58
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART1077 reviews
ARTG1073 reviews
ART1062 reviews
ART1302 reviews
ART1031 review
Show 8 more courses
ART1091 review
ART1421 review
ARTG1031 review
ARTG1411 review
DA1771 review
PAINTG1261 review
SCULPG1411 review
SCULT1421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values