AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

H P Nguyen

MATH030 · MATH185 · MATHG030 · MATH30 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH10 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math and as the main guide.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandFrequent lecture mistakesSelf-teaching requiredMandatory attendanceMixed but mostly negative
  • , and frequent mistakes.
  • A few lower-level reviews say tests can be easy if .
  • The course is risky for beginners because several students say tutoring or self-teaching is needed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

as easy with , but many students need tutoring or self-teaching to do well.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The math becomes harder because , and students often must learn independently.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

One , and no reviews contradict it.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tests can be manageable in some sections, but lectures or homework coverage.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report heavy , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Repeated complaints cite unclear , and limited student support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests, with homework problems often feeding into exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated concerns , and needing outside help.

Main concern

Students may need to self-teach or get tutoring to survive the course.

What students said

“I got an A, but only because I had a tutor.”
MATH10
“ if you are going to teach yourself calculas.”
MATH180
“ .”
MATH185

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention multiple-choice tests, weekly quizzes, and homework-based test problems, but .

Multiple Choice TestsHomework-Based TestsWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tests and quizzes tied to homework, but do .

Multiple Choice TestsHomework-Based TestsWeekly Quizzes
“ .”
MATH185
“ .”
MATH180
“uses the sections as test problems.”
MATH180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are going to teach yourself calculas.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

38/100

“I got an A, but only because I had a tutor.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is horrible, .
  • makes TONs of mistakes during lecture.
  • She'll be there to help you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Fairly easy. No surprises.
  • I spent more time trying to get through this class than I did in Micro or Phys.
  • All you have to do is study and do HW.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Self-Teaching

  • if you are going to teach yourself calculas.
  • Help is nonexistent with her so if you have any kind of math phobia I suggest you try another prof. or get a tutor.
  • The as she never really corrects it or goes over it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews are consistent and detailed, but they are older and include one no-comment review.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1854 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
MATH0301 review
MATH101 review
MATH1101 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH301 review
MATHG0301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1