AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Jen Schumacher

HLED135 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Be cautious in the online class because one technical submission issue may have a large grade impact.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOnline Assignment RiskHarsh Late HandlingLow WorkloadUnforgiving Grading
  • The single review describes an .
  • The student had a very high average before the incident but finished with a C.
  • There is too little evidence to judge .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The course may be academically easy, but one missed online submission can severely damage the .

The only evidence is from one online review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The student had a 98 percent before the dispute, suggesting the course content itself was manageable.

Only one online review supports this judgment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review gives .

No in-person reviews exist, and the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The main concern is harsh handling of a Blackboard submission problem that changed a high grade to a C.

This recommendation is based only on one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The professor reportedly gave zero points for a disputed submission even after the student said they proved it was submitted early.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Light

75/100

The student maintained a 98 percent before the incident, so workload did not appear heavy from the available evidence.

Format shift

Only the online review provides workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

The rating is moderately positive, but the comment focuses on a .

Format shift

There is only one online review and no in-person teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only concrete assessment evidence is a Blackboard assignment submission.

Format shift

Only the online review mentions assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review reports a Blackboard submission dispute where the .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ , but it didn't go through.”
HLED135
“she gave me 0 points.”
HLED135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had a 98% in the class before this incident and ended up with a "C" for the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the dominant theme of online submission and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

15/100

“Instead of working with me after proving I submitted well before the due date, she gave me 0 points.”

📉 Grade Impact

30/100

“I had a 98% in the class before this incident and ended up with a "C" for the semester.”

💻 Online Submission Issue

35/100

“ , but it didn't go through.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Course Risk

  • , but it didn't go through.
  • Instead of working with me after proving I submitted well before the due date, she gave me 0 points.
  • I had a 98% in the class before this incident and ended up with a "C" for the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is narrow despite a specific and detailed complaint.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HLED1351 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values