AI Rate Professor

Design

Chris Cunningham

CBA195 · CBA193 · HEISHARDTOU · DA180 · MACROMEDIAFLASH · WEB200 · G180 · DART200 · DA200 · DARTG180 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle a fast, hands-on design class and will ask for help when the structure feels loose.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHands-on helpFast-paced teachingReal-world design focusLow homeworkMixed structure
  • Many students praise Cunningham for one-on-one help, real-world experience, and enjoyable design classes.
  • Negative reviews , and frustration when students fall behind.
  • The workload is often described as manageable, but and technical programs can be challenging.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A seems reachable with steady class work and , but fast pacing and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Some classes are called easy, but Flash and web design tools can be hard when the pace is fast.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but and in-class help appear important for keeping up.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, though several warn about pace and structure.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

tough finals and substantial class work in some courses.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

, and manageable weekly work, though some programs and finals are harder.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Teaching is often helpful and practical, but fast pacing and weak structure create real frustration for some students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Reviews mention homework, lab work, websites, class work, midterms, and finals, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean positive, with strong praise for hands-on help and concern about pace and organization.

Main concern

Students who need slow pacing and .

What students said

“Spends time with you 1 on 1 to make sure you understand.”
DART200
“teaches too fast and Its .”
DART200
“ .”
G180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with some finals described as tough or project-based and .

Tough But Passable FinalsNo Midterm In One ClassWebsite Or Animation Final

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tough but , and a website or animation final in another.

Tough But Passable FinalsNo Midterm In One ClassWebsite Or Animation Final
“ but passable.”
CBA193
“1-2 Ch. of HW every week, no mid-term; final consisted of the 14 Chapters covered in class.”
CBA195
“Class is HW every meet, no quizzes, 1 mid-term; ”
DA180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher! Funny but serious about the subject matter. Spends time with you 1 on 1 to make sure you understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, pace, workload, and assessments. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Chris was an excellent teacher in his trade.”

⚠️ Pace & Structure

58/100

“teaches too fast and Its .”

📈 Workload Value

76/100

“Not a lot of and guest speakers on using WordPress which I was very happy to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful teacher! He works 1 on 1.
  • Spends time with you 1 on 1 to make sure you understand.
  • He spends time with the students.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Pace & Clarity

  • He is hard to understand….
  • teaches too fast and Its .
  • the class is not structured enough such that a person of average intelligence would know whats expected of them.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Assessments

  • .
  • but passable.
  • Class is HW every meet, no quizzes, 1 mid-term;

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 13 in-person reviews span many years and give detailed but mixed course-specific experiences.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DA2002 reviews
DART2002 reviews
600561 review
CBA1931 review
CBA1951 review
Show 6 more courses
DA1801 review
DARTG1801 review
G1801 review
HEISHARDTOU1 review
MACROMEDIAFLASH1 review
WEB2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values