AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Laura Saldarriaga

CHEM180L · CHEMG185L · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her only if you can handle a and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient gradingRude toneLab help variesEasy A potential
  • , but the student experience depends heavily on coming prepared.
  • Several comments describe rude or impatient behavior when students ask questions.
  • , but students also report rushed guidance and accuracy concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A seems fairly easy because multiple students call the style.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The lab work itself sounds manageable, but harder than the content.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly state an , though lab timing and being prepared matter.

clear policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

but are divided because of rude behavior, rushed help, and accuracy concerns.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly describe her grading as easy or lenient, especially for lab reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

The comments focus on lab reports and preparation rather than heavy workload, and one review calls it an easy A.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She can answer questions and , but students often describe her as rude, rushed, hard to understand, or unreliable.

Format shift

Teaching concerns appear only in in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and lab work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but inconsistent teaching support and a sometimes rude tone.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and occasional accuracy concerns.

What students said

“ and you can sometimes get her to tell you the answers on lab reports.”
CHEMG185L
“she's ridiculously rude; she is practically insulting you when you ask her questions.”
CHEM180L
“ ”
CHEM180L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lab answers but do not clearly prove an .

Lab ReportsExam policy not clearly proven
“you can sometimes get her to tell you the answers on lab reports.”
CHEMG185L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and you can sometimes get her to tell you the answers on lab reports.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Most of the time she explained the procedure well, but sometimes she was rushed and annoyed.”

⚖️

82/100

“but at least her grading is pretty lenient for the most part”

👍 Recommendation Risk

42/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most of the and answered student questions.
  • she's ridiculously rude; she is practically insulting you when you ask her questions.
  • hard accent to understand as well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A guys
  • and you can sometimes get her to tell you the answers on lab reports.
  • but at least her grading is pretty lenient for the most part

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four older in-person reviews give and rude behavior, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM180L3 reviews
CHEMG185L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values