AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catherine Schult-Roman

MATH160 · MATH170 · MATH115 · MATHG030 · MATH180 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a fair math professor and are willing to keep up with homework and ask for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulFair graderMath can be difficultHomework mattersMixed clarity
  • Most students describe her as helpful, fair, and approachable.
  • Math content can still feel hard, especially in trig or fast-paced courses.
  • and keeping up with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A seems realistic with and quiz effort, but several students say the math and workload are not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The courses range from easy stats to difficult trig and fast-paced math, so the content is not consistently easy.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but students repeatedly say coming to class and paying attention helps.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because she is fair, helpful, and and pace.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students describe her grading as fair or lenient, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is manageable for some students but and weekly quizzes, with one review estimating about 8 hours per week.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and fair, though a few students found her explanations confusing or too fast.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, so assessment appears balanced rather than exam-only.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

classes can still require steady work.

Main concern

Students who fall behind or need slow pacing may struggle.

What students said

“if you do the ”
MATH180
“ ”
MATH170
“be prepared to do lots of work”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exams and quizzes as generally fair or doable, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Straightforward ExamsWeekly QuizzesTricky But Doable Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove specific exam rules such as open-book or closed-book.

Straightforward ExamsWeekly QuizzesTricky But Doable Tests
“the and straight forward”
MATH170
“ , but they are easy and quick”
MATH160
“ but completely doable”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super helpful and nice teacher. She and over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She and over.”

⚖️

68/100

“ and fair in how she grades.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“It is not an easy class, be prepared to do lots of work!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really helpful teacher. She breaks everything down for people who don't understand.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the
  • Trig is not an easy class but .
  • but completely doable.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • if you can't keep up with the rapid pace, you won't succeed in this course.
  • Get a tutor (Free 1 hour a week. Recommend Joseph), come to class(actually pay attention in class and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews across several math courses give consistent evidence about teaching, workload, and grading.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1605 reviews
MATH1154 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
MATH1801 review
MATHG0301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1