AI Rate Professor

Art

Ian Hamiltom

ART107 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if and can handle supplies, outside work, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIndividual HelpCreative FreedomOutside WorkStrict AttendanceSupply Costs
  • Students describe him as helpful, inspiring, and strong at one-on-one guidance.
  • ART107 gives creative freedom but requires work outside class and many supplies.
  • Attendance and lateness matter, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Getting an A likely requires steady , and meeting tough expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person ART107 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The projects begin formulaically but become more open-ended, so the content is manageable but not effortless.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty, and they describe both structure and creative freedom.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because he takes roll and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Students recommend him for individual help, repeated instructions, and inspiration, despite the workload and supplies.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

as generous, but they warn about tough expectations and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention work outside class and many supplies, making the workload heavier than a casual art elective.

Format shift

Workload evidence comes only from in-person ART107 reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is described as helpful, repetitive with instructions, and encouraging during individual work.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The class appears project-based, with no review evidence of exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are positive about his guidance and creativity but warn about outside work, supplies, and .

Main concern

The main concern is the combination of required supplies, outside work, and .

What students said

“Fun and really informative, but be prepared to do work outside of class!”
ART107
“requires many supplies. tough expectations.”
ART107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and attendance but do not clearly prove an .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher, he is always walking around helping students individually.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Great teacher, he is always walking around helping students individually.”

📌

20/100

“Keep in and if you are late!”

🧰 Workload Reality

35/100

“requires many supplies. tough expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, he is always walking around helping students individually.
  • He constantly repeats his instructions on a project so that everyone know what they are doing.

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects

  • The but afterwards you are given a lot of freedom with your projects.
  • requires many supplies. tough expectations.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are fairly consistent about support, workload, and attendance.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1073 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values