AI Rate Professor

Music

Roseann Wood

MUSIC101 · MUS116 · MUSIC100 · MUSIC141 · MUSIC116216 · MUS115 · MUS216 · MUSICAPPRECIAT · MUS101 · MUSG100 · MUSICG115 · MUS106 · MUSIC115 · MUSICTHEORY · DIATONICTHEORY · MUSIC116 · HUM120 · MSICHSTRYAPPR · BASICMUSIC · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you , and can tolerate unclear lectures and inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing TeachingHeavy StudyingBoring LecturesUnorganizedAvoid Unless Prepared
  • Many students describe Wood as , and hard to learn from.
  • Music theory and appreciation courses often require prior music , and concert or movie reviews.
  • A few students say she knows music and can be lenient if students try, but negative reviews dominate strongly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned high grades, but many say an A requires heavy study, prior music knowledge, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content is difficult for beginners because reviews repeatedly mention advanced material, , and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance appears important in several reviews, and , though tracking may be inconsistent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students discourage taking her because the class , and difficult to manage.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading appears inconsistent, with some leniency for effort but many reports of , and difficulty earning an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report movie reviews, concert , and substantial studying.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews describe her teaching as confusing, boring, unorganized, unclear, or unhelpful despite some praise for her music knowledge.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and finals, with neither assignments nor exams fully dominating.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing instruction, boring , and some difficult exams.

Main concern

Students often say they felt lost because and the course expected prior music knowledge.

What students said

“ unless you already have a good knowledge of classical music”
MUSICAPPRECIAT
“ and her teaching style is horrible.”
MUSICG115
“Very hard material- if you're not versed in basic .”
MUSIC116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but also difficult finals, listening exams, and frequent testing.

Listening ExamsHard FinalsOpen Book QuizzesFrequent Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention listening exams, open-book quizzes, difficult finals, and frequent tests, but .

Listening ExamsHard FinalsOpen Book QuizzesFrequent Tests
“There are 2 listening exams, which you must know the composers, periods, name of the songs, etc”
MUSIC101
“ , and then gave some difficult finals where you have to know who composed what and the era.”
HUM120
“She test a lot to see where you are but .”
MUSIC116

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very hard material- if you're not versed in basic .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ and her teaching style is horrible.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

30/100

“It takes a LOT of study to get an "A" in her class.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

22/100

“ !!! You will be sorry.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrible teacher I believe that even she did not know what she was teaching to the class.
  • she was a very poor teacher. Does not provide good outline for note taking.
  • A nice enough lady. but always left .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It takes a LOT of study to get an "A" in her class.
  • The if you study and put time into it.
  • .

Theme 3

📝

  • Two movie reviews and one concert review.
  • There are 2 listening exams, which you must know the composers, periods, name of the songs, etc
  • , but the .

Theme 4

⚠️ About Course Fit

  • unless you already have a good knowledge of classical music
  • You're better off knowing a good bit about music before taking this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 37 in-person reviews across many years with detailed and strongly recurring patterns, despite the age of the data.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 510
2 out of 510
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MUSIC1016 reviews
MUS1015 reviews
HUM1204 reviews
MUSIC1164 reviews
MUS1152 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MUS1162 reviews
MUSIC1002 reviews
BASICMUSIC1 review
DIATONICTHEORY1 review
MSICHSTRYAPPR1 review
MUS1061 review
MUS2161 review
MUSG1001 review
MUSIC1151 review
MUSIC1162161 review
MUSIC1411 review
MUSICAPPRECIAT1 review
MUSICG1151 review
MUSICTHEORY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values