AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jamie Jenson

MATH160 · MATH170 · MATHG030 · MATH30 · PRECA170 · G030 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsFunny and engagingFrequent quizzesHomework-driven successHelpful outside class
  • Students consistently praise Jenson for , and willingness to help.
  • Grades are very achievable if , and keep up with frequent quizzes.
  • The main drawback is the steady quiz and homework rhythm, especially in Math 170.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable with and homework, but it is not effortless because quizzes and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but students still describe tests, finals, and the pace as challenging.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but students repeatedly say missing class hurts quiz scores and grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and willing to help students succeed.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and grades fairly, though a few students report tough finals or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and frequent quizzes require steady work, but most students say the work is useful rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

89/100

Most students describe her as , and consistently helpful before, during, and after class.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to , and a final.

Format shift

Assessment details .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe her as , and fair, with and homework.

Main concern

Frequent quizzes and test difficulty punish students who fall behind.

What students said

“If you attend class, do the homework and pay attention you should have no problem getting an A.”
MATH160
“There are quizes based on hw at every class. time consuming not hard.”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard math quizzes, exams, and a proctoring policies.

Homework-Based QuizzesThree ExamsFinal ExamHarder Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or camera policies.

Frequent QuizzesThree ExamsFinal Exam
“3 Exams and 1 final.”
MATH170
“Short quizzes every class meeting.”
MATH170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you attend class, do the homework and pay attention you should have no problem getting an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

89/100

“ , and .”

📈 Effort For A

82/100

“I have an A bc I do 80% of the hw and never miss a class.”

⚖️

76/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Probably the
  • .
  • and takes the time to help you before and after class.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is quite a bit of
  • and examples.
  • and quizzes, but the .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • If you do all of the HW and attend class everyday, you will pass with an A.
  • She offered extra credit at the end of the course and an .
  • Toward the end of the semester she became a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 21 detailed in-person reviews across several years with highly consistent themes.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH17013 reviews
MATHG0303 reviews
MATH302 reviews
G0301 review
MATH1601 review
Show 1 more courses
PRECA1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values