AI Rate Professor

Biology

Alicia Fox

BIOL220 · BIO100 · BIO220L · BIOG220L · BIO220 · BIO100L · BIOL100 · BIOL220L · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can learn the material almost entirely on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingUnpreparedRude toneSelf-teaching requiredExam preparation issues
  • Most reviews describe very poor teaching, little guidance, and .
  • Students repeatedly report rude or unhelpful behavior when they ask for support.
  • The course feels difficult mainly because students must teach themselves and are not prepared for tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and widespread failing despite effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content may not be inherently advanced, but weak guidance and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance does not appear strictly enforced, but missing because guidance is already limited.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because they describe poor teaching, little help, and unprofessional behavior.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and many students failing.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students , and self-teaching that adds heavy effort.

Format shift

All and lab sections.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most students , and does not teach effectively.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests, but no single assessment type is clearly dominant.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated complaints about poor instruction, lateness, weak guidance, and rude responses.

Main concern

Students say they receive little help and often must teach themselves.

What students said

“She's not a teacher. She doesn't teach anything.”
BIO220L
“You'll basically have to teach yourself the material”
BIO220
“ !”
BIO100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring, but and difficult.

Poor Exam PreparationUnclear TestsStudy Guides Not Matching Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Poor Exam PreparationUnclear Tests
“does not help you prepare for exams”
BIOG220L
“nothing from the study guide was on the test”
BIO100
“ .”
BIO100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll basically have to teach yourself the material”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting consistent themes in teaching, support, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She doesn't teach anything.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

“ ! DO NOT TAKE HER! DO NOT TAKE HER!”

📚

25/100

“does not help you prepare for exams”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach anything.
  • Ineffective and sloppy.
  • , and .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Support & Fairness

  • didnt care for her students
  • provides no help!
  • Gives .

Theme 3

📈

  • nothing from the study guide was on the test
  • .
  • You'll basically have to teach yourself the material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years are highly consistent and detailed despite being older.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

BIO1004 reviews
BIO220L2 reviews
BIO100L1 review
BIO2201 review
BIOG220L1 review
Show 3 more courses
BIOL1001 review
BIOL2201 review
BIOL220L1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1