AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mutsuno Ryann

MATH160 · MATH103 · MATH104 · STATS160 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want help, but be cautious with the online format if you struggle with math.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful in personOnline struggleStrict deadlinesCalculator resistanceNo textbook
  • In-person students describe her as nice, available, and willing to help.
  • The only online review is sharply negative and .
  • Students who struggle with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A does not look automatic because the online review reports major struggle, but .

Online evidence is negative and effort-heavy, while with support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is manageable for some but difficult for students who need calculator-based instruction or .

Online comments describe high difficulty, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but online deadlines are described as strict.

, while in-person reviews focus on access to help rather than attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

the online format.

Online evidence warns against the format, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , but the online F and strict deadlines suggest limited leniency.

Format shift

Online grading experience appears harsher, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not described as huge, but the online class felt demanding and deadline-sensitive.

Format shift

The workload concern comes mainly from the online review.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is helpful and , but the .

Format shift

Teaching quality appears much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether grades .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and willing to help before, after, or outside class.

Main concern

Her accent may require some students to ask for repetition or clarification.

What students said

“she'll help you any way she could.”
MATH104
“Can come in earlier/stay after class to ask for help if needed.”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and little flexibility.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn independently and manage strict deadlines.

What students said

“I struggled a lot and .”
STATS160
“Deadlines are a big deal to her.”
STATS160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you struggle with Math, either way Professor Ryan is a good instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“The class is set up well and she is willing to help.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“I struggled a lot and .”

❤️ In-Person Help

70/100

“Can come in earlier/stay after class to ask for help if needed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's a .
  • .

Theme 2

💻 About Format Differences

  • Take in class
  • if you struggle with Math

Theme 3

📌 About Class Rules

  • Deadlines are a big deal to her.
  • no textbook is needed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

and limited assessment detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1031 review
MATH1041 review
MATH1601 review
STATS1601 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values