AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Garet Hill

MATH160 · STATISTICS160 · STATS160 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take him for statistics if you want a supportive instructor, but .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful InstructorClear ExplanationsStats Made FunHomework HeavySummer Pace Risk
  • Most students strongly praise his clarity, personality, and willingness to help.
  • Tests are described as simple or clearly previewed when students keep up with homework and calculator skills.
  • One summer review warns that the class can become overwhelming because and self-teaching may be needed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

77/100

A good grade is realistic because tests are simple and , but and calculator practice still matter.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Statistics becomes easier through his clear explanations, but summer pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because students say system.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

, and able to make statistics enjoyable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reviews suggest exams are simple and clearly previewed, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Regular workload may be manageable, but as very long and confusing.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students praise his clarity, helpfulness, humor, and care for students.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention both homework and and tests described as simple or clearly previewed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews portray him as , and engaging, with manageable exams but .

Main concern

The main concern is long and .

What students said

“ so much sense.”
MATH160
“ and confusing, about 3 hours per section.”
STATS160
“tells you whats .”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests as simple and predictable, but .

Simple TestsExam Topics PreviewedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove the format, proctoring, or book policy.

Simple TestsExam Content PreviewedNo Pretest Mentioned
“ .”
STATS160
“tells you whats .”
MATH160
“There is no pretest for the exam”
STATS160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely loved this class; one of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ so much sense.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“ and confusing, about 3 hours per section.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and answers all your questions.
  • Great instructor! Makes sure that you understand the materials well enough
  • He genuinely cares about his students & is a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • I ended up with an A
  • tells you whats .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Do the
  • and confusing, about 3 hours per section.
  • You basically have to teach yourself a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on only 5 in-person reviews from a short time span, though the positive teaching themes are fairly consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1602 reviews
STATS1602 reviews
STATISTICS1601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1