AI Rate Professor

English

Peter Brennan

ENGLENGL · ENGG100 · G100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

unless you can tolerate public criticism and strict detail-based rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPublic CriticismStrict GrammarRigid AttendanceUnhelpful FeedbackIrritable
  • Students repeatedly describe public criticism and embarrassment as the main problem.
  • Grammar, MLA, lateness, and absence rules appear strict despite low intellectual difficulty.
  • The class may be passable, but the student experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The class sounds passable and not intellectually hard, but strict grammar, MLA, lateness, and raise the real cost of passing well.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The course content appears basic and low difficulty, but detail-heavy writing rules make it less comfortable.

Only in-person reviews describe the course, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review says he marks students down for being late or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Students mainly discourage taking him because they describe public embarrassment, anger, and weak writing help.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, and absence, even though the course itself is not described as hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Students mention a workbook and writing work, but do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

28/100

Students repeatedly describe him as publicly critical, irritable, and unhelpful with writing papers.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and MLA rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently report harsh classroom behavior, strict grammar expectations, and little useful writing support.

Main concern

Students say he criticizes or embarrasses people publicly.

What students said

“He takes pleasure in criticizing and making fun of you publicly.”
ENGG100
“He also marks you down for being late or absent.”
ENGG100
“ .”
ENGLENGL

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He'll make fun of you, literally make fun of you and will embarrass you in front of the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“This professor is very strict about grammar and MLA.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Climate

  • He takes pleasure in criticizing and making fun of you publicly.
  • He gets irritated very easily at small things.
  • He criticizes your mistakes publicly.

Theme 2

📈 About Rules and Grades

  • This professor is very strict about grammar and MLA.
  • He also marks you down for being late or absent.
  • It's a pass or fail class.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Support

  • Does not give a .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

and specific about classroom behavior, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGG1002 reviews
ENGLENGL1 review
G1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values