AI Rate Professor

Biology

Amanda Gerrard

BIO220L · BIOLG220 · BIO170L · BIOANAT · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful but impatientDifficult practicalsClearer than lectureRude responsesShorter labs
  • Students describe her as sometimes helpful and engaging but often impatient when questioned.
  • Practicals and because questions may go beyond what students expected.
  • time, which reduces workload pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A seems possible with steady study, but difficult practicals and .

All evidence comes from in-person lab reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The class content is not described as too hard, but practicals and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, but one review says she did not keep students for the full lab time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend her only conditionally because and rude interactions.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

but can feel rigid when answers fall outside her expected scope.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload seems moderate because labs may end early, but practicals require real study.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Teaching is mixed because some students find her clear and helpful while others find her rude and unsupportive.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment evidence centers on practicals and lab work, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

explanations for some students but repeated complaints about rude responses and difficult practicals.

Main concern

Students may .

What students said

“Her lectures were easier to understand than the actual lecture teacher.”
BIOLG220
“ and guessing.”
BIO170L
“You cant ask questions without getting a rude snide remark from her.”
BIOANAT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult practicals but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

Difficult PracticalsRigid Answer ScopeUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes feel outside expected material.

Difficult PracticalsRigid Answer Scope
“Practicals quite difficult.”
BIO170L
“ because my answer(while not incorrect) was outside the scope of the material.”
BIO220L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures were easier to understand than the actual lecture teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Her lectures were easier to understand than the actual lecture teacher.”

⚖️

45/100

“ because my answer(while not incorrect) was outside the scope of the material.”

📈 Difficulty

50/100

“Practicals quite difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Can be fun and engaging; can also be impatient and crabby.
  • and .
  • You cant ask questions without getting a rude snide remark from her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class itself weasnt too hard.
  • her practicals were not hard if you put the time in to study the material.
  • Questions on practical could be on things you had not seen before.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but limited recent evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO170L1 review
BIO220L1 review
BIOANAT1 review
BIOLG2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values