AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Linda McCauley

CHEM · CHEM100 · CHM130 · CHEMISTRY · CHEM130 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and self-directed chemistry studying.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but unclearWeekly quizzesCurve helpsHard graderChemistry prep
  • Reviews are highly mixed, with some students saying she prepares them well and .
  • Grades and an 80 percent A threshold, but , and tests as demanding.
  • She may work for disciplined students who attend, study consistently, and can learn from notes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Curves and an 80 percent A cutoff help, but students still say you must study hard and understand the material.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Some call the course easy, but chemistry content, labs, quizzes, and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Lecture and lab attendance matter because quizzes come from lecture and as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student values preparation and and .

Recommendation and is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and may set an A around 80 percent, but many students still call her a hard or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

There is often little or , but , and studying create steady pressure.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students often say she is nice and knowledgeable, but .

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

, and a final more than by homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split between students who value her preparation and and .

Main concern

The main concern is unclear teaching combined with , and grading.

What students said

“She really prepares you for the next level of chemistry.”
CHEM130
“She is very nice but a and does not make the .”
CHEMISTRY
“ , but a !”
CHEM130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam and quiz structure sounds standard to demanding, with , and no clear evidence of student-friendly formats.

Weekly QuizzesHard FinalLab Counts Toward GradeCurve

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention weekly quizzes, a , and curves, but do not clearly prove open-book or .

Weekly QuizzesHard FinalLab Grade WeightCurve
“ . .”
CHEM130
“Watch out Hard Quizes!!!”
CHEM
“Lab counts as 25% of grade.”
CHEM130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very nice but a and does not make the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessments. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She seems to like her job and cares that her students learn and understand!”

⚖️

55/100

“She is very nice but a and does not make the .”

🧪 Assessment Load

75/100

“ , but a !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knows her stuff.
  • .
  • ...

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Difficulty

  • you have to work hard to get a good grade in her class.
  • She grades on a curve...hell yeah!
  • Fairly easy, anyone with a 80% or better got an A.

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • , but a !
  • Watch out Hard Quizes!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

but conflicting evidence, making the overall pattern credible.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM13018 reviews
1301 review
CHEM1 review
CHEM1001 review
CHEMISTRY1 review
Show 1 more courses
CHM1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values