AI Rate Professor

Education

Sharon Yaron

ED200 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take this class if you want a low-stress course with and a strong chance at an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSweetVery Simple ClassEasy ADiscussion BasedProject Based
  • Students describe the class as very simple and easy to pass.
  • The A appears and projects.
  • Evidence is limited to one in-person-coded review, despite the student saying they took it online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

The student directly calls it an easy A and says completing discussions and projects is enough.

though the comment says the student took it online.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The class is described as very simple with straightforward discussion and project work.

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The tone is positive because the professor is described as sweet and the class as simple.

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, despite the comment mentioning an online experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because the student says the class is an easy A for completing the work.

Format shift

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, so .

Workload

Featherlight

94/100

Workload appears very light because only discussions and projects are mentioned.

Format shift

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

The professor is described positively, but there is little detail about teaching quality.

Format shift

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, with no online review count to compare.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The review mentions discussions and .

Format shift

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, and it supports assignment-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only authoritative format evidence is in person, and the review describes a very simple class with discussions and projects.

Main concern

The evidence is thin because there is only one review.

What students said

“so sweet! took her online, very simple class. just do the discussions and the .”
ED200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person-coded review does not clearly mention exams, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“so sweet! took her online, very simple class. just do the discussions and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“so sweet! took her online, very simple class. just do the discussions and the .”

📈 Easy A Signal

96/100

“just do the discussions and the .”

👍 Recommendation Tone

90/100

“so sweet!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very simple class.
  • just do the discussions and the .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • so sweet!
  • so sweet! took her online, very simple class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on one old review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ED2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values