AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ryan McKeachie

CHEM110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you already have chemistry confidence and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely challengingVague answersPowerPoint reliantHard quizzesFair partial credit
  • The class is described as extremely difficult, especially for students without chemistry background.
  • Teaching support appears weak because the and PowerPoint-based.
  • There is , but it does not offset the difficult experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A likely requires major effort because the course is extremely challenging and quizzes are described as very hard.

All grade-effort evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels very difficult because the reviewer had no chemistry background and found the .

The course-difficulty evidence is entirely from the in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The reviewer signals a poor experience because the class was extremely challenging and .

Recommendation is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

because partial credit is given on the midterm and final, but .

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

The course feels overwhelming due to extreme challenge and very hard computer quizzes.

Format shift

Workload and difficulty evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The reviewer says he relies on PowerPoint and gives vague answers to questions.

Format shift

Teaching-quality evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The and final, so assessments appear exam-heavy.

Format shift

, and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The with vague instruction and hard computer quizzes.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“This was the most challenging class I have ever encountered.”
CHEM110
“he is fair with partial credit for midterm and final.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments and final with partial credit, making exam risk high but not fully harsh.

Hard Computer QuizzesMidtermFinalPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mentions very hard computer quizzes and a midterm and , but .

Hard Computer QuizzesMidtermFinalPartial Credit
“ SO hard but he is fair with partial credit for midterm and final.”
CHEM110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the most challenging class I have ever encountered.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in difficulty, teaching clarity, and ; credibility rating: Low.

🔥 Course Difficulty

12/100

“This was the most challenging class I have ever encountered.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

30/100

“He relies on ppt and is very vague when answering your questions.”

⚖️

52/100

“he is fair with partial credit for midterm and final.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This was the most challenging class I have ever encountered.
  • SO hard but he is fair with partial credit for midterm and final.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he did not.
  • He relies on ppt and is very vague when answering your questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, though it contains specific details about teaching and assessments.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values