AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Tom Heimann

ACCT202 · ACCT100 · ACCT101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Consider him only if you are comfortable learning independently, because the available comments give mixed and limited support evidence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed reviewsPoor online supportLimited evidenceHigh uncertainty
  • The evidence is thin and inconsistent, with one very positive comment, one vague review, and one negative support complaint.
  • A student warned against taking him online because they felt unsupported and .
  • There is not enough comment detail to .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

There is , and the negative review describes confusion severe enough to drop the class.

All counted reviews are in person, though one comment warns about an online experience despite its format flag.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and there is too little positive detail to offset that concern.

The as in person, with no authoritative online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly mention attendance rules or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is uncertain because the and one review has no substance.

All authoritative review-count evidence is in person, with no separate online review count.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but the drop-to-avoid-failure comment suggests .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described clearly, so the score reflects uncertainty rather than proven heaviness.

Format shift

The counted in-person comments do not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and one serious complaint about lack of help.

Format shift

All counted reviews are in person, though one comment references online support problems.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The authoritative format count is in person, but the comments are mixed and include a warning about lack of help in an online experience.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent support and very limited useful detail.

What students said

“refused to help your on your own”
ACCT100
“No Comments”
ACCT202
“he is the .”
ACCT101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, proctoring, open-book rules, Lockdown Browser, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or test format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“refused to help your on your own”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting the limited and conflicting evidence on support and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Support Risk

55/100

“refused to help your on your own”

👍 Mixed Recommendation

45/100

“he is the .”

📉 Evidence Quality

35/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • refused to help your on your own
  • he is the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Risk

  • i had no clue about anything in regards to accounting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews are available, one has no comment, and the remaining comments conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT1001 review
ACCT1011 review
ACCT2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values