AI Rate Professor

Photography

William Hare

PHOTG120 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPlays favoritesLateNot recommended
  • The only review is clearly negative and says favoritism affected credit.
  • The teaching experience is weak because the professor is described as consistently late.
  • There is not enough evidence .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

There is no grade evidence, and the only review suggests credit may not be awarded fairly.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The review does not describe the course content as especially easy or hard.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only student directly .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The due.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The review describes favoritism and consistent lateness.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and no recommendation.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Picks favorites and does not give credit where credit is due.”
PHOTG120
“Consistently late.”
PHOTG120
“ .”
PHOTG120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Picks favorites and does not give credit where credit is due.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Consistently late.”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“Picks favorites and does not give credit where credit is due.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Consistently late.
  • Picks favorites and does not give credit where credit is due.

Theme 2

👍 About Recommendation

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the signal is narrow and low-confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHOTG1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values