AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Pat Pattison

DA101 · DARTG101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if it is required, because the workload is light but many students found the class low-value.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLow workloadPoor relevanceUnclear valueIndustry storiesMixed personality
  • Most reviews say the course is easy but not useful for Digital Arts.
  • Students criticize the class as a poor use of time and money.
  • One review praises his art-world knowledge and career perspective.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The course sounds very light for most students, but one review reports a B despite turning in , so an A is not guaranteed.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Most comments describe the class as low-effort, basic, and filled with nontechnical activities rather than hard concepts.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against the class because they see little useful learning despite the easy workload.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

balanced by one student who felt a B was disappointing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students describe much of the work as show-and-tell, group work, and resume activity rather than demanding coursework.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students describe him as nice and knowledgeable, but most negative reviews say the teaching is irrelevant and low-effort.

Format shift

, and they are mixed but mostly negative on teaching value.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention group projects, resume-building, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

sharply mixed views on whether the content is useful.

Main concern

Students often say the class wastes time and lacks practical Digital Arts value.

What students said

“Biggest waste of time on campus.”
DARTG101
“Nothing taught is applicable to Digital Arts.”
DARTG101
“ . He is very knowledgeable about the art world.”
DARTG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove whether exams exist or how they are administered.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, proctoring, open-book format, midterm, or final exam structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nothing taught is applicable to Digital Arts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching value and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Value

36/100

“Nothing taught is applicable to Digital Arts.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ .”

🧾 Workload Lightness

78/100

“Most of the work is either Student Show-and-Tell (really?) followed by an and Resume-building assignment that is better had elsewhere on campus.”

Theme 1

🎯 About Usefulness

  • Biggest waste of time on campus.
  • Nothing taught is applicable to Digital Arts.
  • It will give you a much better outlook on how to make it out in the world as an artist.

Theme 2

📚 About Work and Grading

  • Most of the work is either Student Show-and-Tell (really?) followed by an and Resume-building assignment that is better had elsewhere on campus.
  • Gave me a B when I turned in 3 final pieces (a promotional of oneself for a job interview).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are polarized with and policies.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DARTG1013 reviews
DA1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values