AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Rebecca Stillman

PSCI180 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are ready to keep up with readings and participate, because the limited evidence points to a demanding class with uncertain learning payoff.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNice personalityReading heavyObscure midtermParticipation requiredLow learning payoff
  • One student found her very nice but did not learn much.
  • Another says the class depends heavily on reading, outlines, and participation.
  • The as using very obscure questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A , and handling obscure midterm questions.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course appears demanding because students must read before class or they will not understand the discussion.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation is described as key, so class presence appears important even if .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

The professor is described as nice, but the reviews raise concerns about low learning value and difficult assessments.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The and required detailed preparation suggest strict assessment, though .

Format shift

Only one .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The class requires reading the book, detailed outlines, and preparation before discussion.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

She is described as very nice, but one student says they did not learn anything new and another found the class .

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course appears to combine reading preparation, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a nice professor but a .

Main concern

Students may feel lost without doing the readings and detailed outlines before class.

What students said

“one of the nicest teachers at GWC but didn't learn anything new.”
PSCI180
“You have to read the book, and midterm.”
PSCI180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The questions, making exam risk high.

Obscure Midterm Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

obscure questions, but does not prove book policy, proctoring, or final format.

Obscure Midterm Questions
“very obscure questions on the midterm.”
PSCI180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to read the book, and midterm.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, exams, and teaching experience. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Demand

28/100

“You have to read the book, and midterm.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“one of the nicest teachers at GWC but didn't learn anything new.”

📝

30/100

“very obscure questions on the midterm.”

Theme 1

📚 About Preparation

  • You have to read the book, and midterm.
  • the readings are required before class, if you don't read you will have no idea what is being discussed.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • one of the nicest teachers at GWC but didn't learn anything new.
  • Participation is key in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is sparse and may not represent the full course experience.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSCI1802 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values