AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J A Jaber

MATH106 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a students struggle.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulPatientBeginner FriendlyHighly Recommended
  • The strongest review describes him as very helpful and willing to spend extra time with students.
  • The class appears manageable for students who struggle with math.
  • One review has no useful comment, so detailed confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The course seems manageable because he helps struggling students, but comments do not prove a free or effortless A.

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material may include difficult word problems, but the professor's support makes it beginner-friendly.

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students recommend him because , and willing to spend extra time explaining math.

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

There is , so grading appears fair rather than clearly lenient.

Format shift

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

No heavy workload is mentioned, but the comments focus on help rather than workload details.

Format shift

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The detailed review strongly praises his patience, helpfulness, and extra support.

Format shift

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence is counted as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for both reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person evidence is positive, especially for students needing extra help with math.

Main concern

One of the two reviews has no details, limiting the evidence base.

What students said

“he does everything he can to help”
MATH106
“ ”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he does everything he can to help”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“he does everything he can to help”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“ ”

❤️ Student Support

78/100

“ and spent extra with me helping with my math”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he does everything he can to help
  • and spent extra with me helping with my math

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two old reviews and one contains no substantive comment.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1062 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values