AI Rate Professor

Art

Thomas Butler

ART118 · ARTART · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a strong art instructor and are willing .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear DemonstrationsSkilled ArtistThorough TeacherFun ClassNot Effortless
  • Students consistently describe him as , and thorough.
  • , but students say they learn a lot.
  • The course is beginner-friendly in teaching style but can be tough for first-time drawers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students do not describe an easy A, but the difficulty ratings are modest and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

and demonstrations make the material accessible, though first-time drawers may find it tough.

, and they consistently mention clear demonstrations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but strict attendance penalties are not clearly stated.

The in-person evidence says students should show up, while there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because he teaches clearly, knows the subject, and keeps class useful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Reviews suggest clear expectations but .

Format shift

and comes from in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments are described as not easy, but not overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload, especially drawing assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and class atmosphere.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person and consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments focus on assignments, demonstrations, and drawing work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and strong art expertise.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ , and you will learn a lot.”
ARTART
“ and does demonstrations so you know what's expected, but still keeps the class fun.”
ART118

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and learning value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and does demonstrations so you know what's expected, but still keeps the class fun.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“ , and you will learn a lot.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

91/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough with his teaching, and straight forward.
  • and does demonstrations so you know what's expected, but still keeps the class fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Learning

  • , and you will learn a lot.
  • For a first time ever drawer, could be tough.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because three reviews are consistent and specific but old and limited in number.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1182 reviews
ARTART1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values