AI Rate Professor

English

Diane Ewing

ENG250 · ENG290 · ENG100 · ENG295 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless the course is required and you can handle heavy reading, dull lectures, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesHeavy ReadingNitpicky GradingLow Teaching ValueLimited Help
  • Most students strongly criticize the teaching experience as boring or ineffective.
  • The course may be passable if students keep up with reading and directions, but it is not engaging.
  • Several reviews describe high frustration, nitpicking, and limited support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Passing may be possible, but the reading load and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Some students call the class fairly easy, but heavy reading, boredom, and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it mixes passable content with frustrating execution.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students advise looking elsewhere because the class is boring, unhelpful, and frustrating.

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and high frustration, though one says students can pass by following directions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

A , and assignment criticism appears demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most reviews describe the professor as boring, ineffective, or unhelpful despite one report of niceness and help.

Format shift

positive exception.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus on reading, essays, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and limited learning value.

Main concern

Students repeatedly describe the class as boring and the professor as unhelpful or overly critical.

What students said

“ .”
ENG100
“extremely boring. Takes an interesting subject and turns it into a snooz fest.”
ENG295

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, final format, or proctoring policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor has no business teaching. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Horrible professor but the only one that taught British Lit.”

📚 Workload And Difficulty

32/100

“While this class may not be for everyone due to the large amount of .”

⚖️

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible professor but the only one that taught British Lit.
  • extremely boring. Takes an interesting subject and turns it into a snooz fest.
  • This professor has no business teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class is fairly easy if you keep up with the reading and follow directions that are given.
  • you won't learn one thing, but you'll pass.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Do yourself a favor and look elsewhere.
  • If you're taking this class for fun, look elsewhere.
  • Little help given the succes of class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five old in-person reviews give consistent negative themes with one more balanced review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG2952 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG2501 review
ENG2901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values