AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Marykay Keegan

NSG100 · NURSI100 · NURSN150 · NUR100 · N100 · NURSG100 · NURSE100 · NURSING100 · NURN200 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid Marykay Keegan unless you are highly resilient and have no better nursing option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh experienceUnclear teachingCriticizes studentsHigh difficultyConflicting older improvement
  • Most reviews , and unprofessional behavior.
  • A small minority says she improved and .
  • The course experience appears difficult and emotionally stressful for many students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A is possible for some students, but most reviews describe a very difficult and stressful class environment.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, which are mostly negative with a few positive exceptions.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels hard because , and stressful criticism.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

The comments do not clearly prove a .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking her because they found the , and unprofessional.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with negative warnings far outweighing the few positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Reviews describe criticism, lack of objectivity, and very high difficulty, though one student reports earning an A.

Format shift

and is mostly negative.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload itself is not described in detail, but the course is repeatedly rated very difficult and stressful.

Format shift

, and workload evidence is indirect.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most reviews describe unclear, unhelpful, critical, or unprofessional teaching, despite a few positive reports.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate the evidence and show a strong negative pattern with limited improvement signals.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not provide enough specific information about exams, assignments, or clinical assessment weights.

Format shift

Assessment-method evidence is unclear across the in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and high difficulty, though two students report helpful experiences.

Main concern

Students , and a stressful learning environment.

What students said

“Prehistoric, forgetful, not clear, not helpful, fake smile, criticizes students, and tedious lectures.”
NURSE100
“Horrible Horrible Horrible teacher.. do yourself a favor and go somewhere else for nursing or ..”
NURSG100
“ and got an A in the class.”
NURSN150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book status, closed-book status, proctoring, midterm rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible Horrible Horrible teacher.. do yourself a favor and go somewhere else for nursing or ..”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and student treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Prehistoric, forgetful, not clear, not helpful, fake smile, criticizes students, and tedious lectures.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“Do not go here for nursing.”

📈 Difficulty Level

32/100

“Sure, she is not easy, but it's no excuse to show such utter hatred.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Contradicts herself often.
  • Prehistoric, forgetful, not clear, not helpful, fake smile, criticizes students, and tedious lectures.
  • this is a horrible teacher

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Treatment

  • No compassion for people.
  • critisizes students for being wrong when they perform as instructed.
  • All of the first semester teachers are burnt out and get verbally violent when questioned.

Theme 3

🌗 About Mixed Experiences

  • and got an A in the class.
  • and .
  • She has really changed for the better.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence includes 11 in-person reviews over several years with a strong and repeated negative pattern, though some comments are old and emotionally charged.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

NURSING1003 reviews
N1001 review
NSG1001 review
NUR1001 review
NURN2001 review
Show 4 more courses
NURSE1001 review
NURSG1001 review
NURSI1001 review
NURSN1501 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values