AI Rate Professor

English

Van Dees

ESL043 · ESL022 · ESL042 · ESL052 · ESL071 · ENGL032 · ESL053 · ESL032 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you specifically want a strict ESL class and can tolerate a harsh teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh personalityPoor supportTough classDisrespectful toneMixed teaching value
  • Most students describe a hostile classroom tone and weak support.
  • A few students say the class can build useful English skills if you can handle strictness.
  • The main risk is not only difficulty but feeling disrespected or dismissed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students describe strictness, little support, and a tough classroom experience.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The ESL content may be learnable, but and tough expectations make the course feel challenging.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise avoiding her because they felt disrespected, unsupported, or poorly taught.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students describe her as very tough, but comments .

Format shift

evidence.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is not clearly detailed, but students describe a demanding and stressful class experience.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews criticize her teaching, respect for students, and classroom tone, despite a few positive remarks.

Format shift

The teaching evidence is entirely in person and strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated , and toughness.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report a harsh tone and limited help.

What students said

“She is useless and doesn't teach.”
ESL071
“She's is a if you want to learn.”
ESL071
“she's very tough, but she is a great teacher.”
ESL042

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, tone, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She is useless and doesn't teach.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

18/100

“No respect at all!”

📚 Learning Value

32/100

“she's very tough, but she is a great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is useless and doesn't teach.
  • she's very tough, but she is a great teacher.
  • if you want to learn.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Respect

  • She is very impolite, and her class is not always good mood.
  • No respect at all!
  • She does not allow other opinions in her class without shutting them down with her own ignorance.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty

  • she's very tough, always not in good mood
  • If you don't pass her class, you're going to have big time in the future.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews across several years with consistent negative themes, but many are old and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ESL0714 reviews
ESL0322 reviews
ENGL0321 review
ESL0221 review
ESL0421 review
Show 3 more courses
ESL0431 review
ESL0521 review
ESL0531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values