AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Robert Miner

AUTOG140 · AUTO140 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you need guidance or serious A.S.E. preparation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot HelpfulPoor Test PreparationLow EngagementVery Easy
  • Two detailed reviews strongly warn that he is unhelpful and does not prepare students for the A.S.E. test.
  • The course appears very easy, but students report little learning value.
  • Evidence is thin and old, with one positive rating containing no usable comment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class seems low-effort based on very low difficulty ratings, but comments .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is rated very low in difficulty, but students criticize the lack of preparation rather than challenging content.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students strongly discourage taking him because they say he is unhelpful and does not prepare students for the A.S.E. test.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

because no grades or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Light

78/100

Very low difficulty ratings suggest a light workload, though comments do not describe assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Two detailed reviews describe him as unhelpful, uncaring, and ineffective at test preparation.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the detailed comments are strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and focus on poor help and weak preparation.

Main concern

Students say he does not help or prepare them for the A.S.E. test.

What students said

“ ”
AUTO140
“he doesn't prepare the student for the A.S.E test”
AUTOG140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention A.S.E. preparation concerns but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, quiz format, final format, or proctoring rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“This professor doesn't prepare his student for the A.S.E test.”
AUTO140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wouldn't recommend for anyone to take his class because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and preparation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ because he's not a good professor.”

🧪 Test Preparation

20/100

“he doesn't prepare the student for the A.S.E test”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's not a good professor .
  • He's not a helpful professor

Theme 2

📉 About Learning Value

  • This professor doesn't prepare his student for the A.S.E test.
  • He doesn't care if the student does the work or not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one has no comment, but the two detailed comments are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AUTO1402 reviews
AUTOG1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values