AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Carrie

MATHG30 · MATH280 · MATH30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if , but if you already know the basics and dislike repetitive software-based work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplanationsHelpful for BeginnersWeekly QuizzesRule-FollowingMixed Engagement
  • Most students say and supports students who need step-by-step help.
  • The course can feel boring or overly basic for students who already know the material.
  • Homework and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students suggest you can do well by attending lecture and practicing the note problems, though limited partial credit requires care.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is presented step by step and may feel too basic for students who already know algebra.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

One review explicitly says attendance is optional, though .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but complaints about boredom and software keep the recommendation moderate.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Tests align with notes, but one student warns he gives limited partial credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Weekly quizzes and , but students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students mostly praise his clarity, especially for .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe clear step-by-step , and some complaints about boredom and software.

Main concern

Some students find the class boring or too dependent on the ReyCarr program.

What students said

“ so anyone can learn it.”
MATHG30
“ and there is not book”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as similar to notes, but reviews .

Note-Based ExamsWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Note-Based ExamsWeekly Quizzes
“He tends to make his exam problems more like the notes than the textbook problems.”
MATH280
“There is a .”
MATHG30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so anyone can learn it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ so anyone can learn it.”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“Go home and do the problems from the notes and you'll be fine.”

⚖️

58/100

“He doesn't give as much partial credit as scardina so be careful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so anyone can learn it.
  • Just attend the lecture and you'll understand everything.
  • boring,goes thru every single step but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Go home and do the problems from the notes and you'll be fine.
  • He tends to make his exam problems more like the notes than the textbook problems.
  • He doesn't give as much partial credit as scardina so be careful.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Format

  • There is a .
  • You use a program called and .
  • and there is not book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four old reviews are fairly consistent but limited in modern relevance.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH302 reviews
MATH2801 review
MATHG301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values