AI Rate Professor

English

Annette Kohls

ENGL10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider this professor only if you are comfortable with limited review evidence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLimited evidenceNo written feedbackModerate difficulty
  • The only review gives a solid rating but .
  • Difficulty appears moderate from the numeric rating.
  • There is not enough comment evidence to judge teaching style or grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

There is no comment evidence about grades, so an A appears to require normal effort by default.

All evidence comes from one in-person rating with no written grade details.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course appears standard because the only difficulty rating is moderate and .

All evidence comes from one in-person review with no written course-detail evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

The numeric quality rating is positive, but there is no written evidence explaining why.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one in-person rating with no written comment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is , so as unknown and likely fair by default.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

There is no workload evidence, so workload cannot be judged beyond a moderate default.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it has no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

The rating is decent, but the lack of written comments prevents a stronger teaching-quality judgment.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it gives no teaching details.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not identify whether the class is assignment-heavy or exam-heavy.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The , so format-specific experience is unclear.

Main concern

There is too little evidence to predict the classroom experience.

What students said

“No Comments”
ENGL10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No Comments”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the lack of . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“No Comments”

📊 Evidence Strength

20/100

“No Comments”

📈 Course Difficulty

50/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

📝 About Review Detail

  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review and it has no written comment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values