AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Qiang Sui

CHEM15 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Acceptable Chem15 option if and prepare for closed-book tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardRespectfulDeadline FlexibleClosed-Book ExamsLab Lecture GapsDoable Homework
  • Only two Chem15 reviews paint a
  • and deadlines can be extended, but
  • Midterms and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

and deadlines flexible, but closed-book exams and no keep an A from being free.

All evidence is from in-person/hybrid Chem15 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with and .

Only in-person hybrid Chem15 comments available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory for the hybrid class structure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One explicit yes and one non-answer leave recommendation lukewarm given solid respect but teaching gaps.

Based solely on two in-person Chem15 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

No and closed-book exams, but notes and practice questions track closely to assessments.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

as not crazy heavy and very doable with flexible deadlines.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Respectful and helpful in lecture, but and timing of .

Format shift

In-person hybrid only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and final.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Hybrid Chem15 with ; students find him respectful and flexible on deadlines but note quiz/exam timing misalignment and .

Main concern

, so students lean on YouTube; .

What students said

“Good professor, really respectful and will help students but felt lil unprepared due to the of the quizzes or exams.”
Chem15
“His lab lectures are lacking, I had to rely a lot on youtube videos. No work. Finals and , but he gives out practice questions that helps.”
Chem15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterms and finals are closed book; practice questions help but .

Closed-book midtermClosed-book finalPractice questions provided

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students explicitly report closed-book midterms and finals with practice questions provided.

Closed-book examsPractice questionsNo extra credit
“Finals and , but he gives out practice questions that helps.”
Chem15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as he understands student's busy lives. His notes are pretty good and most information from there are in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting respect, homework flexibility, and closed-book exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Good professor, really respectful and will help students but felt lil unprepared due to the ”

📚

40/100

“ a lot on youtube videos.”

📝

35/100

“Finals and , but he gives out practice questions that helps.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really respectful and will help students
  • His notes are pretty good

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No work
  • Finals and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from one course limit confidence despite reasonable detail in both comments.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Chem152 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1